docs: add missing tool, correct coverage claim - #3
Merged
Conversation
- Current Capabilities listed only enrichr_pathway; toolserver/tools/ also has a real, tested david_annotation.py handler. Added. - Testing/Status claimed "100% coverage". A live `pytest --cov=.` run: 97% overall (every module under toolserver/ itself is 100%; setup.py is the only untested file, pulling the whole-repo total down). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
enrichr_pathway;toolserver/tools/also has a real, testeddavid_annotation.pyhandler. Added.pytest --cov=.run: 97% overall (every module undertoolserver/itself is 100%;setup.pyis the only untested file).Testing
Docs-only change, verified via a live
pytest --cov=.run and directory listing — not against the prior README text.🤖 Generated with Claude Code