Skip to content

docs: add missing tool, correct coverage claim - #3

Merged
man4ish merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-tools-coverage-sync
Aug 8, 2026
Merged

docs: add missing tool, correct coverage claim#3
man4ish merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-tools-coverage-sync

Conversation

@man4ish

@man4ish man4ish commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Current Capabilities listed only enrichr_pathway; toolserver/tools/ also has a real, tested david_annotation.py handler. Added.
  • Testing/Status claimed "100% coverage". A live pytest --cov=. run: 97% overall (every module under toolserver/ itself is 100%; setup.py is the only untested file).

Testing

Docs-only change, verified via a live pytest --cov=. run and directory listing — not against the prior README text.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

- Current Capabilities listed only enrichr_pathway; toolserver/tools/
  also has a real, tested david_annotation.py handler. Added.
- Testing/Status claimed "100% coverage". A live `pytest --cov=.` run:
  97% overall (every module under toolserver/ itself is 100%; setup.py
  is the only untested file, pulling the whole-repo total down).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@man4ish
man4ish merged commit d8d6167 into main Aug 8, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant