Repository navigation
Releases: Added the 1.0.0 release notes - #118
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The release draft resolves to 1.0.0 now that #94 carries major: its templates target Forgejo 17, and admins on Forgejo 16 have to stay on 0.4.0. The notes give the summary, the tested Forgejo version and that upgrade warning. CONTRIBUTING lists Templates as an area, as #94 and #95 use it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds the release notes for the next release. #94 now carries
major: its templates target Forgejo 17, so admins on Forgejo 16 have to stay on 0.4.0. That makes the draft resolve to 1.0.0 instead of 0.5.0..github/release-notes.mdgives the draft its summary and compatibility section once this merges:CONTRIBUTING adds
Templatesto the list of areas, as #94 and #95 use it.The titles of #94–#116 were renamed to the past-tense
Area: Descriptionconvention; their labels were already right.Checks
🤖 Generated with Claude Code