Skip to content

docs(register): C-95 was a 3.0.0 rider and was missed — say so - #300

Merged
Polichinel merged 1 commit into
developmentfrom
docs/c95-missed-rider
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

Polichinel merged 1 commit into
developmentfrom
docs/c95-missed-rider

Conversation

@Polichinel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Register-only correction.

C-13's 3.0.0 execution record said "Riders: none open". That was wrong. C-95's trigger named the next MAJOR as the moment for its two-line fix (the index write-protects the caller's time/unit arrays), and 3.0.0 was that MAJOR. This PR says the rider was missed and moves C-95's precondition to the MAJOR after 3.0.0. No code change; validate_docs and check_doc_refs pass.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01Q77JMFJbxEabjGdAh8jHWA

C-13's 3.0.0 execution record said "Riders: none open". C-95's trigger named
the next MAJOR as the moment for its two-line fix, and 3.0.0 was that MAJOR.
The record now says the rider was missed, and C-95 waits for the MAJOR after
3.0.0. No code change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Q77JMFJbxEabjGdAh8jHWA
@Polichinel
Polichinel merged commit dcc7df7 into development Nov 2, 2026
11 checks passed
@Polichinel
Polichinel deleted the docs/c95-missed-rider branch November 2, 2026 00:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant