Skip to content

ROX-36447: Enable both clair-scan and roxctl-scan- #3867 - #3927

Open
vickeybrown wants to merge 1 commit into
release-3.25from
ROX-36447-roxctl-scan-4.11
Open

ROX-36447: Enable both clair-scan and roxctl-scan- #3867#3927
vickeybrown wants to merge 1 commit into
release-3.25from
ROX-36447-roxctl-scan-4.11

Conversation

@vickeybrown

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replace clair-scan task with roxctl-scan to provide better security coverage as per Konflux Integration Service Team migration plan.

Changes:

Updated task name from clair-scan to roxctl-scan
Updated bundle reference to task-roxctl-scan:0.1
Removed matrix configuration as roxctl-scan handles multi-arch natively

@vickeybrown
vickeybrown requested review from a team and rhacs-bot as code owners September 4, 2026 19:39
@rhacs-bot
rhacs-bot requested a review from a team September 4, 2026 19:39
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 27.34%. Comparing base (543b7bc) to head (5ead732).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           release-3.25    #3927   +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage         27.34%   27.34%           
=============================================
  Files                95       95           
  Lines              5420     5420           
  Branches           2545     2545           
=============================================
  Hits               1482     1482           
  Misses             3211     3211           
  Partials            727      727           
Flag Coverage Δ
collector-unit-tests 27.34% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants