Repository navigation
feat(lineage): write fork lineage back into Codex rollouts - #83
Open
malihashar wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
malihashar wants to merge 1 commit into
malihashar wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #82.
Problem
Meta::lineageis read-only today —forked_from_idis read from Codex rollouts, but nothing ever writes it back. A session copied viacontinue <id>#rangeorcroploses its parent link entirely once written back out.Fix
Codex's
from_commonnow writesForklineage assession_meta.forked_from_idfor same-harness copies. Scope is intentionally narrow:Fork, UUID parent).Spawn/Continuerelations (no matching native field without changing the session's meaning), non-UUID parents, and cross-harness copies (Lineage::parentonly makes sense within one harness).from_common. Covered by a byte-for-byte cross-harness test.Open questions (flagged in #82)
ForkorContinue?Forkaccurate for an editedcropcopy, not just a plain continue?