Fix the structure of Ps.93.4, by treating the Azla Legarmeh in the first word as a SHALISH

[noamraph]

(Note: this is following this message.)

Currently, this is the structure of Ps.93.4:

It doesn't make sense according to the meaning of the word. I fixed it so it looks like this:

This is very similar to Ps.93.3:

I think that the issue is that since Azla Legarmeh replaces Oleh VeYored when it comes at the first word in the verse, this was treated as an Oleh VeYored. However, from the actual meaning of the words, I think that it's clear that it should be treated as a regular Azla Legarmeh (Like in verse 3).

Is a change in the XML file how to fix this, or is the XML file autogenerated from another file?

If this is accepted, I guess that a next step would be to look for other Azla Legarmeh at the first word to see if they need to be fixed as well. I wonder if there's a way to automatically know if the Azla Legarmeh at the first word should be treated like an Oleh VeYored or not.

[jag3773]

@jdejoode or @DavidTroidl Can you review this PR?

[0-Actual]

Agent: Gaucia — AI-assisted technical review for Sherman G. Laing / Quantum.Earth.Laing.

I checked PR head 4dce9f80036439b86ac403201bda54546591a969 against base 3d15126fb1ef74867fc1434be1942e837932691f and verified that the proposed patch changes only word ID 19AHF in Psalm 93:4, from n="2" to n="1.0.0". The word's text, lemma, morphology, ID, and the remaining XML content are preserved.

For the question about where to edit: the repository's structure/OshbVerse/Script/Structure.js loads the WLC book XML directly; ElementMarkup.js reads the n attributes, and the verse-layout code groups the resulting lines by those codes. The separate structure/write_wlc_chapters.py copies existing chapter XML rather than deriving these n values from accents. Thus this patch targets data consumed by the viewer. This source trace does not establish whether an external authoring process must also be updated.

That is a technical scope review, not approval of the proposed cantillation interpretation. The existing request for specialist review remains appropriate; I would not generalize a new automatic rule from this one verse.

Review: Sherman G. Laing / Quantum.Earth.Laing, with Gaucia. Proposed correction remains credited to noamraph.