test(tree): cover divergent optional field compatibility - #28131
Draft
Alex Villarreal (alexvy86) wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
test(tree): cover divergent optional field compatibility#28131Alex Villarreal (alexvy86) wants to merge 1 commit into
Alex Villarreal (alexvy86) wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: ebede8a0-bce8-450f-9855-65dc1e8b0bc8
Contributor
|
Hi! Thank you for opening this PR. Want me to review it? Based on the diff (64 lines, 1 files), I've queued these reviewers:
How this works
|
Contributor
Bundle size comparisonBase commit: Notable changesNo bundles changed by ≥ 500 bytes parsed. Per-bundle deltas
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Adds a unit test covering TreeView compatibility when two schemas share the same node identifier and allow unknown optional fields, but independently add different optional fields.
The test creates one document with
fieldAand another withfieldB, then opens each document using the other view schema. It documents that both cross-open scenarios are incompatible:canView,canUpgrade, andisEquivalentare false, and accessing the root throws a compatibility error.Reviewer Guidance
The review process is outlined in the pull request guidelines.
Please confirm that the asserted incompatibility is the intended behavior for divergent optional fields when
allowUnknownOptionalFieldsis enabled.