Skip to content

docs: add Code of Conduct and explain top-level process folders - #62

Merged
marcohost33-maker merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/aussenwirkung-2026-10-14
Oct 27, 2026
Merged

marcohost33-maker merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/aussenwirkung-2026-10-14

Conversation

@marcohost33-maker

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Documentation only; no code, workflow or policy change.

  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (new): Contributor Covenant 2.1, original text from contributor-covenant.org. Only the [INSERT CONTACT METHOD] placeholder is filled (this repository's private reporting form, Security tab; private vulnerability reporting is enabled here) and the trailing blank line is removed (markdownlint MD012).
  • README.md: new subsection "Process folders" under "Repository map", one line each for 00_landkarte/, 007acc/, pr_nr/, todo/, messungen/, inventar/, archiv/, .repostandard14/; plus one sentence pointing to the Code of Conduct in "Contributing and security reports".

Rationale

The community profile lacked a Code of Conduct (the only missing item). An own file was chosen over relying on the account-wide default in marcohost33-maker/.github, because that default only takes effect once its PR is merged, and because this file can name this repository's reporting form directly.

The top-level process folders come from the repository template (.copier-answers.yml) and were not explained anywhere in the README; outside readers could not tell project code from bookkeeping. The descriptions follow each folder's own README.md; empty folders are marked as empty.

Scope / risk

  • APP-01 only; no trust boundary, control, telemetry or dependency touched.
  • No public claim beyond what the folders contain.

Evidence (local, Windows 11, Node 24.17.0 / npm 11.13.0; CI pins Node 22.23.1)

  • npm ci --ignore-scripts --audit=false --fund=false -> exit 0
  • npm run docs:governance -> "Documentation governance check passed."
  • npm run docs:lint -> 62 files, 0 issues
  • markdown-link-check --config .markdown-link-check.json on README.md and CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md -> exit 0
  • npm test -> 382 tests, 375 pass, 0 fail, 7 skipped
  • npm run verify:local -> "RESULT: OK" (toolchain warning only). Note: one earlier verify:local run reported the test step as failed; its output was not captured, and the two following runs (npm test, verify:local) passed. No test reads the files changed here.

Marco-Text unveraendert gelassen

  • All existing README sections, including "Release claim" and "Governance", are unchanged.
  • SECURITY.md, CONTRIBUTING.md: unchanged.

Not in this PR: open Dependabot alerts (separate work).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

- CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md: Contributor Covenant 2.1 original text; only the
  contact placeholder is filled (this repository's private reporting form)
  and the trailing blank line removed for markdownlint MD012.
- README: new subsection "Process folders" with one line per template
  folder (00_landkarte, 007acc, pr_nr, todo, messungen, inventar, archiv,
  .repostandard14) and a pointer to the Code of Conduct. Existing text
  unchanged.

Local: docs:governance, docs:lint and markdown-link-check on both files
pass; verify:local OK.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@marcohost33-maker
marcohost33-maker marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2026 15:47
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-21T20:55:36.969905Z fa60014 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@marcohost33-maker

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review — against d24c698

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

Reviewed commit: d24c698b4d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@marcohost33-maker

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review — against fa60014 (merge of main into the docs branch; the two PR files are byte-identical to the reviewed d24c698)

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next?

Reviewed commit: fa600148ab

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@marcohost33-maker
marcohost33-maker merged commit 21a5019 into main Oct 27, 2026
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant