docs: the product thinker plans the fourteen specless intents and the two run drafts - #654
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…e product thinker's rulings Nudge once at the last close, a ranked few on embark, the durable-tier layout; the seed is the per-intent audit that exists. Planned through a hand move to drafts, since no verb gives a planned intent a spec (iss-2609211738504433). Refs: iss-2609211738504433 Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
…ng it asked for Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
… links Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
…e board says how stale each is Re-scoped to the pin and the staleness view; the store, the redaction and the verifier are dropped in favour of what the record already holds. Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
…b, the kinds being shipped Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
… v0.1.0 with no spec to close The three criteria that wait on other records become issues so they are not forgotten; the record carries shipped_in so the next cut does not report v0.1.0 work as new. Refs: iss-2609211905340006, iss-2609211905346507, iss-2609211905347458 Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
…it must answer Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
…g interview Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
…le going to the kinds lint Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
…age of build Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
…ites a verdict Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
… route Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
…installed Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
…in v0.1.0 Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
…ve the build loop an issue key Candidate set = every refusal check of build; the reason is the lane's first commit; age breaks ties only; equal weights declared; falsifiers the state file can meet; a remedy field required for drain; categories and order declared over the ledger's enum; promoted_to named; the ADR as a prerequisite; next_eligible_at instead of a pause; command-page criteria; sibling links typed related. Decision 10 on the build intent: the loop takes iss-N as well as itd-N. Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
…al reviews The record-discipline review's findings applied (the pick commit at the branch base and the receipt count; the gate skipping the run marker; a footprint section seeded by plan; capture promote's owner named as itd-119; the remedy field inside the schema scope; the detector as the loop's definition of done; the re-derived classification as a decision; the parent's decisions ordered and its criteria map renumbered), specs written, grounds recorded, both READY. Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
…rafts into the calibration note Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
REPPL
enabled auto-merge
September 21, 2026 20:34
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
The product thinker's interview of 2026-09-21 over the fourteen planned intents that had no spec (the autonomous run's SKIPs) and the two run drafts filed that morning, one question at a time under the GRILL rules, with every ruling recorded on the record it governs:
reclassifyverb; the kinds themselves shipped long ago), itd-42 (the coherence pre-pass before the planning interview, itd-84's next rung), itd-48 (the corpus consistency pass; the shape role goes to itd-34's lint), itd-50 (the audit-driven fix round as the build loop's last stage; unachievable reopens to drafts), itd-53 (intent audit --owed, one bounded command for the backlog), itd-6 (RepoPrompt over MCP as one opt-in reviewer route, falling back to the host with a receipt), itd-63 (a missing tool is explained before it is installed).shipped_in: v0.1.0; itd-36's three criteria that wait on other records are captured.abcd build next(itd-2609211116005482) andabcd drain(itd-82), with seventeen findings applied; the build machinery gains decision 10 (the loop takesiss-Nas well asitd-N) and decision 8's rename stands (buildfor people,implementfor the machine).Why
The autonomous run could build only what its gate reports READY; fourteen adopted intents were invisible to it, and no verb gives a planned intent a spec (iss-2609211738504433), so each went back to drafts by hand and through
plan. The READY set moves from 48 to 60 of 62 planned.Review
Two independent adversarial reviews ran on the two run drafts before planning (design and feasibility; record discipline); their findings are applied in the two commits that name them, and three of them were ruled by the product thinker rather than patched (the issue key, the
remedy:field, where the pick's reason is committed). The record gate, the reviews-charter gate and the full preflight pass; the branch was rebuilt once so that no commit touches an append-only review artefact.Records
Refs: iss-2609211738504433, iss-2609211905340006, iss-2609211905346507, iss-2609211905347458
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5