Skip to content

Publish CI red since March + legacy packaging: maintenance-mode plan #14

Description

@thorwhalen

From an automated fleet audit (2026-08-11). Recording findings + plan for this maintenance-mode package (README points users to its successor, ho).

Findings

  • The last two master CI runs failed in the Publish (3.10) job (logs expired) — consistent with the known wads legacy-publish breakage for un-migrated repos (current_pypi_version missing import), so PyPI may be behind master.
  • Legacy packaging: setup.cfg + setup.py (0.1.30), no pyproject.toml.
  • Tracked build/ and egg-info artifacts in the tree.
  • Thin test surface: essentially one test module for ~15 modules.

Recommended plan (maintenance-mode scope — keep it minimal)

  1. Modern wads migration (pyproject + uv CI stub) — fixes the publish job as a side effect; the smallest honest fix given the known root cause lives in the legacy path.
  2. Remove tracked build artifacts, extend .gitignore.
  3. Do NOT invest in test expansion here — the successor is ho; add a deprecation pointer in the PyPI long_description instead so pip users learn about ho.

Verify PyPI vs master version drift before publishing anything (a burned version number can't be reused).

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions