Repository navigation
docs: rewrite the entry documents to the standard (re-anchoring WO 3.4) - #77
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Owner rulings 2026-11-11: the proof lists hold true obligations only; EXPLAINME moves to the root; a status document may cite a CI run read in the session, labelled as such. - README.adoc: overview, what it does, a planned note, quick start, layout, documentation and licence, per the README and EXPLAINME authoring standard. Each claim has an EXPLAINME entry. - EXPLAINME.adoc (moved from docs/): a claim map, a dogfooding table, known gaps, an evidence index and the proof ledger (3 proven of 5; 1 argued, 1 open). docs/EXPLAINME.adoc is a pointer. The root allow-list and the deed's root-cleaner rules admit it. - ROADMAP.adoc: the stages, the rulings (D-10 recorded), stage 3 progress and the new findings; the template milestones go. - PROOF-NEEDS.adoc and PROOF-STATUS.adoc: THY-1 discharged, the token-lattice theorems and the applied invariants open; the template obligations ABI-1 to ABI-5, TP-1 and TP-2 leave. The THY-1 record is unchanged. - READINESS.adoc (grade D, provisional) and TEST-NEEDS.adoc: from runs. - usage, contributing and troubleshooting: real content. - Deed (variant (paths)): records the move, and restores the two label files that the merge of WO 3.2 and WO 3.5 dropped from :diverged. Observed in this session on main f778a19 plus this change: just check-views (census 8 files, atlas 13 tests, registry 14 tests), validate-repo-map, validate-claude-md, validate-coapt, validate-state, validate-rsr, the canon deed lint, check-adoc-renders (180 files clean, asciidoctor 2.0.26), check-no-placeholders, the invisible-character check, the root shape and both shape tests pass. The proof figures cite CI run 43057783538 (main at b2cf524), read in this session. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0136P7Zo9dheFQzYYWV49hAk
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed.
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. |
|
hyperpolymath
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 11, 2026 17:54
Codex Review Summary: ❌ FailedThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



Summary
Work order 3.4 of
docs/proposals/mathesis-re-anchoring.adoc. The entry and status documents now describe Mathesis, not the RSR template. Owner rulings of 2026-11-11, through the selector: the proof lists hold true obligations only; EXPLAINME moves to the root; a status document may cite a CI run read in the session if it says so.Changes
README.adoc: written to the README and EXPLAINME authoring standard. Each claim has an EXPLAINME entry.EXPLAINME.adoc: moved fromdocs/to the root and rewritten. It has a claim map, a dogfooding table (5 rows), known gaps, an evidence index and the proof ledger: 3 proven of 5, with 1 argued and 1 open.docs/EXPLAINME.adocis now a pointer. The root allow-list and the deed's root-cleaner rules admit the file.ROADMAP.adoc: the stages table, the rulings with D-10 recorded, stage 3 progress and the new findings. The template milestones are gone.PROOF-NEEDS.adoc,PROOF-STATUS.adoc: THY-1 discharged, the token-lattice theorems and the applied invariants open. The template obligations ABI-1 to ABI-5, TP-1 and TP-2 are removed. The THY-1 record is unchanged.READINESS.adoc: grade D, provisional until you confirm it. The applied shelf is not graded.TEST-NEEDS.adoc: written from runs.usage,contributing,troubleshooting: real content. Each troubleshooting entry is a failure met in practice.(variant (paths)): records the move. It also restores the two label files that the merge of WO 3.2 and WO 3.5 dropped from:diverged.New findings (in ROADMAP, for you)
just crg-gradeandcrg-badgeread a rootREADINESS.mdthat does not exist, so both always printX.dustclause damaged by the name pass, the stale Containerfile reference incompose.yaml, the Rust tool without CI, and the U+2014 incoapt.nclare also recorded.RSR Quality Checklist
As Applicable
docs/status/ROADMAP.adocupdatedTesting
Run in this session on
mainf778a19plus this change:just check-views: pass (census 8 files, atlas 13 tests, registry 14 tests)just validate-repo-map,validate-claude-md,validate-coapt,validate-state,validate-rsr, canon deed lint: passscripts/check-adoc-renders.sh: 180 files render clean (asciidoctor 2.0.26)check-no-placeholders, invisible-character check, root shape, bothtests/shapetests: passThe proof figures cite CI run 43057783538 (
mainatb2cf524, read in this session); its four lane and golden-path steps succeeded. Not run here:just check-proofs(no Guix and no provers in this container).Generated by Claude Code