Skip to content

docs: rewrite the entry documents to the standard (re-anchoring WO 3.4) - #77

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/mathesis-stage-3-reanchoring-s2qr20
Nov 11, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/mathesis-stage-3-reanchoring-s2qr20

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Work order 3.4 of docs/proposals/mathesis-re-anchoring.adoc. The entry and status documents now describe Mathesis, not the RSR template. Owner rulings of 2026-11-11, through the selector: the proof lists hold true obligations only; EXPLAINME moves to the root; a status document may cite a CI run read in the session if it says so.

Changes

  • README.adoc: written to the README and EXPLAINME authoring standard. Each claim has an EXPLAINME entry.
  • EXPLAINME.adoc: moved from docs/ to the root and rewritten. It has a claim map, a dogfooding table (5 rows), known gaps, an evidence index and the proof ledger: 3 proven of 5, with 1 argued and 1 open. docs/EXPLAINME.adoc is now a pointer. The root allow-list and the deed's root-cleaner rules admit the file.
  • ROADMAP.adoc: the stages table, the rulings with D-10 recorded, stage 3 progress and the new findings. The template milestones are gone.
  • PROOF-NEEDS.adoc, PROOF-STATUS.adoc: THY-1 discharged, the token-lattice theorems and the applied invariants open. The template obligations ABI-1 to ABI-5, TP-1 and TP-2 are removed. The THY-1 record is unchanged.
  • READINESS.adoc: grade D, provisional until you confirm it. The applied shelf is not graded. TEST-NEEDS.adoc: written from runs.
  • usage, contributing, troubleshooting: real content. Each troubleshooting entry is a failure met in practice.
  • Deed (variant (paths)): records the move. It also restores the two label files that the merge of WO 3.2 and WO 3.5 dropped from :diverged.

New findings (in ROADMAP, for you)

  • The template recipes just crg-grade and crg-badge read a root READINESS.md that does not exist, so both always print X.
  • The dust clause damaged by the name pass, the stale Containerfile reference in compose.yaml, the Rust tool without CI, and the U+2014 in coapt.ncl are also recorded.

RSR Quality Checklist

As Applicable

  • docs/status/ROADMAP.adoc updated
  • Documentation updated for user-facing changes

Testing

Run in this session on main f778a19 plus this change:

  • just check-views: pass (census 8 files, atlas 13 tests, registry 14 tests)
  • just validate-repo-map, validate-claude-md, validate-coapt, validate-state, validate-rsr, canon deed lint: pass
  • scripts/check-adoc-renders.sh: 180 files render clean (asciidoctor 2.0.26)
  • check-no-placeholders, invisible-character check, root shape, both tests/shape tests: pass
  • No added line holds U+2014.

The proof figures cite CI run 43057783538 (main at b2cf524, read in this session); its four lane and golden-path steps succeeded. Not run here: just check-proofs (no Guix and no provers in this container).


Generated by Claude Code

Owner rulings 2026-11-11: the proof lists hold true obligations only;
EXPLAINME moves to the root; a status document may cite a CI run read
in the session, labelled as such.

- README.adoc: overview, what it does, a planned note, quick start,
  layout, documentation and licence, per the README and EXPLAINME
  authoring standard. Each claim has an EXPLAINME entry.
- EXPLAINME.adoc (moved from docs/): a claim map, a dogfooding table,
  known gaps, an evidence index and the proof ledger (3 proven of 5;
  1 argued, 1 open). docs/EXPLAINME.adoc is a pointer. The root
  allow-list and the deed's root-cleaner rules admit it.
- ROADMAP.adoc: the stages, the rulings (D-10 recorded), stage 3
  progress and the new findings; the template milestones go.
- PROOF-NEEDS.adoc and PROOF-STATUS.adoc: THY-1 discharged, the
  token-lattice theorems and the applied invariants open; the template
  obligations ABI-1 to ABI-5, TP-1 and TP-2 leave. The THY-1 record is
  unchanged.
- READINESS.adoc (grade D, provisional) and TEST-NEEDS.adoc: from runs.
- usage, contributing and troubleshooting: real content.
- Deed (variant (paths)): records the move, and restores the two label
  files that the merge of WO 3.2 and WO 3.5 dropped from :diverged.

Observed in this session on main f778a19 plus this change:
just check-views (census 8 files, atlas 13 tests, registry 14 tests),
validate-repo-map, validate-claude-md, validate-coapt, validate-state,
validate-rsr, the canon deed lint, check-adoc-renders (180 files clean,
asciidoctor 2.0.26), check-no-placeholders, the invisible-character
check, the root shape and both shape tests pass. The proof figures cite
CI run 43057783538 (main at b2cf524), read in this session.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0136P7Zo9dheFQzYYWV49hAk
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Explain Change →

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2026 17:54
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ❌ Failed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ❌ Failed 2026-11-11T17:55:03.190996Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
7415a1d Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit c81cb84 into main Nov 11, 2026
44 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants