Skip to content

More idiomatic API #134

Description

@appetrosyan
    Yeah, here I'm mostly focusing on at least having actual types instead of jsonly-typed blobs of something.

Making it look like Python will require either way more future work or some approach to codegen I didn't think of.

Originally posted by @QuentinI in #125 (comment)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementiroha2Pull requests and issues associated with iroha 2

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions