Skip to content

Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.8.11 - #9554

Open
hash-dependencies[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/jdx-mise-2026.x
Open

Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.8.11#9554
hash-dependencies[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/jdx-mise-2026.x

Conversation

@hash-dependencies

@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change Pending
jdx/mise patch 2026.8.10 → 2026.8.11 2026.9.1 (+6)

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

jdx/mise (jdx/mise)

v2026.8.11

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
🚜 Refactor
📚 Documentation
⚡ Performance
🧪 Testing
📦️ Dependency Updates
📦 Registry
Chore
Security
New Contributors
📦 Aqua Registry Updates
Updated Packages (1)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
  • Automerge
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate CLI.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
hash Ready Ready Preview Sep 6, 2026 5:32pm UTC
hashdotdesign-tokens Ready Ready Preview Sep 6, 2026 5:32pm UTC
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview Sep 6, 2026 5:32pm UTC
petrinaut-docs Ready Ready Preview Sep 6, 2026 5:32pm UTC

Request Review

@github-actions github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) labels Sep 6, 2026
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Sep 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Low Risk
Patch bump to the mise installer and CI action only; no app logic, auth, or data paths change.

Overview
Bumps the pinned mdx/mise release from 2026.8.10 to 2026.8.11 everywhere the repo pins the binary.

.config/mise/config.toml raises min_version so local mise must meet the new floor. .config/mise/install.sh downloads and verifies the matching GitHub release tarball. .github/actions/install-tools passes the same version to jdx/mise-action for CI tool installs (mise install --env ci --locked).

No application or runtime code changes—only the dev/CI toolchain version.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 7967eb9. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.89%. Comparing base (eea4e1f) to head (7967eb9).
⚠️ Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9554      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.89%   60.89%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1461     1461              
  Lines      146725   146725              
  Branches     6744     6744              
==========================================
- Hits        89343    89342       -1     
- Misses      56264    56265       +1     
  Partials     1118     1118
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.99% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 15.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-graph 13.32% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 38.15% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 3.27% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 12.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 2.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.81% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.19% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
rust.harpc-tower 67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-config 74.74% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 19.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authentication 96.02% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 63.14% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings 91.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 32.15% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 48.41% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 50.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 84.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-middleware 90.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 89.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 28.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 78.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 79.82% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 87.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ 6 benchmarks measured no execution time

Nothing ran under measurement, usually because the compiler removed the code under test. These results are not comparable, so they count as unchanged.

Preventing compiler optimizations

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
⚠️ as_constant < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ constant_equal < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ constant_not_equal < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ access < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ runtime_equal < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ runtime_not_equal < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A

Comparing deps/jdx-mise-2026.x (7967eb9) with main (8828644)

Open in CodSpeed

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$21.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.900 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002 $$9.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$9.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527 $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.150 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$21.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 169 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.806 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.334 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.020 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.991 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52 $$2.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.957 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$3.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.064 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.081 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108 $$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.316 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.047 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.938 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.467 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$1.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.115 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2 $$2.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.890 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.150 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.465 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.569 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.342 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.672 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27 $$2.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.320 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$2.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.572 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$2.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.481 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 153 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.278 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$56.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.13 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.849 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.209 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$31.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 128 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$26.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.123 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$329 \mathrm{ms} \pm 910 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.125 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$66.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 398 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$66.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 401 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.673 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$220 \mathrm{ms} \pm 690 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$7.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.296 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$8.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 42.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.130 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$8.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.653 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$8.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.248 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$8.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.241 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$7.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.137 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$7.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.682 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$8.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.202 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$8.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.367 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$8.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.262 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$8.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$8.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.876 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$8.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$8.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.030 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$8.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.996 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$8.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.036 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$8.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.787 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$8.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.486 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$8.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$6.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.457 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$41.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$80.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 431 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.156 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$45.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 209 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.919 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$51.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 440 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.421 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$58.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.842 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$63.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 390 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.067 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.094 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$54.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.157 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$37.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 210 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.046 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$44.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 206 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.111 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$45.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$45.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.487 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$88.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 571 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.796 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$97.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 575 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.928 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.170 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$394 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.43 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.564 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area)

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants