[fengzeroz]

No description provided.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-12T07:28:34.368498Z	0d73014	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 91.60305% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 69.04%. Comparing base (96efee0) to head (b66b762).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on v2.16.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
plugins/restful/datatag_handle.c	35.71%	9 Missing ⚠️
src/adapter/driver/driver.c	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/parser/neu_json_rw.c	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            v2.16    #2959      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.95%   69.04%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         137      137              
  Lines       34671    34799     +128     
==========================================
+ Hits        23909    24026     +117     
- Misses      10762    10773      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 0d73014fe1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Preserve the ascending sign when parsing GET sorts

When a caller uses the accepted ascending spelling directly in the GET URL, for example ?sort_by=+name, neu_http_get_param_str passes it through neu_url_decode, which rewrites the literal + to a space (src/utils/http.c:75-76); neu_tag_get_sort_cmp then receives " name" and this path returns NEU_ERR_PARAM_IS_WRONG. Thus ascending GET sorting only works if clients happen to percent-encode the sign as %2B, while the equivalent JSON API accepts +name as-is; preserve or normalize the leading sign before validating this parameter.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.