Skip to content

test: prove durable lifecycle transitions and recovery (#65) - #68

Merged
szmyty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
test/flow-65-durable-lifecycle
Sep 26, 2026
Merged

szmyty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
test/flow-65-durable-lifecycle

Conversation

@szmyty

@szmyty szmyty commented Sep 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Durable state now supports recovery, but its conformance evidence needs to show exactly what survives cancellation, failure, and a fresh host process. This adds the test-owned lifecycle corpus for #65.

Local validation: Rust 1.85 and stable formatting, Clippy with warnings denied, all-target acceptance/lifecycle gates (81 + 34 recipes, twice each), documentation tests, three examples, and package verification. Python report/resource regressions, contract/source checks, and repository validators pass.

This uses existing public Flow APIs and durable schemas. The corpus qualifies Linux synthetic trusted-unconfined providers; authority/effect counters and residual cleanup remain #66. Parent #31 stays open. Host exits are tested before launch and after direct-provider reaping, not while an unconfined provider or descendants remain alive.

Closes #65.

Rollback is a revert of this test/documentation PR; no persisted runtime schemas or production execution behavior change.

CI run 36233562728 passed all five jobs for review head 680f9c205a791c7872bd18b7561e8fa425db78d8: Rust 1.85, stable Rust, repository validators, and macOS/Windows durable-state checks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FLO-13.4b] Add deterministic durable lifecycle traces and recovery scenarios

1 participant