chore: fix formatting nits from PR #432

[cyberjunky]

Summary

Two lines from #432 (menstrual-writes) didn't match ruff format's output — cosmetic only, no behavior change:

• demo.py's workout-upload "file not found" hint was wrapped across 3 lines when it fits on one.
• get_menstrual_reports()'s URL f-string was split across 2 lines when it fits on one.

Test plan

• python -m pytest -q (399 passed)
• ruff check / ruff format --check / mypy all clean

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Style
  • Reformatted internal code for improved readability.
  • No user-visible behavior or functionality changed.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 0aec2c9e-d694-481d-8ad2-ac41fa0c7cfa

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cc95938 and ca669db.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• demo.py
• garminconnect/__init__.py

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review.

---

Walkthrough

The pull request reformats one print call and one URL f-string. The printed message and generated URL remain unchanged.

Changes

Formatting cleanup

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Formatting updates demo.py, garminconnect/__init__.py	The workout file hint uses a single-line print call. The menstrual reports URL uses a single-line f-string. Both preserve existing behavior.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Other

Suggested reviewers: tshogx

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to ca669

The existing workout-upload message and menstrual-report URL are preserved, so this cleanup is ready to merge.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the formatting-only changes and references the related PR. It is concise and matches the main change.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 2 functions across 2 files.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}