Skip to content

Land shipmill's config upgrades without a question - #196

Merged
romamo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/autonomy-levels
Nov 9, 2026
Merged

romamo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/autonomy-levels

Conversation

@shipmill-romamo

@shipmill-romamo shipmill-romamo Bot commented Nov 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Plan

  • Serves: quality bar
  • Files: .github/shipmill.toml
  • Order: one change, [autonomy] upgrade = "act"
  • Proof: shipmill decide levels on the branch reads upgrade act (autonomy), security and protected still ask

Summary

Sets [autonomy] upgrade = "act", so shipmill's own config migrations land without a needs-decision question. Requested by @romamo in chat on 2026-11-09.

Why: over the last 30 days every upgrade question across the connected repositories whose answer could be read (8 of 8) was settled by taking the recommended option. Nothing else changes: [decisions] stays at its defaults.

Checked: shipmill decide levels on this branch reads upgrade act (autonomy), and security and protected still read ask.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@shipmill-romamo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@romamo Decision needed: should shipmill's own config upgrades land without asking you ([autonomy] upgrade = "act")?

  1. Merge this PR (recommended): upgrade pull requests that github-ship-watch opens merge on green CI with no question, as the last 8 of 8 answered upgrade questions took the recommended option. Cost: a config migration you'd have declined lands, and you revert it by hand.
  2. Close it: every upgrade keeps asking you first, as now. Cost: one question per shipmill config upgrade.

The change is one line in .github/shipmill.toml, and CI is green. The merge gate holds it in the security zone (.github/** outside [decisions]). The body says you asked for it in chat, but a merge can't rest on a PR body's claim, so your reply here is the approval.

Reply here with a number or your own answer; shipmill takes this up on the tick after your reply.

@shipmill-romamo shipmill-romamo Bot added the needs-decision A shipmill session asked a question here; waits for a reply label Nov 9, 2026
@shipmill-romamo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Decision by @romamo, relayed by Claude Code

Answered in chat on 2026-11-09: 1, merge this pull request, [autonomy] upgrade = "act".

@shipmill-romamo shipmill-romamo Bot removed the needs-decision A shipmill session asked a question here; waits for a reply label Nov 9, 2026
@romamo
romamo merged commit ec52123 into main Nov 9, 2026
1 check passed
@romamo
romamo deleted the claude/autonomy-levels branch November 9, 2026 08:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant