Skip to content

Refuse Node runtimes at validate and in the Render importer (S-002-14, S-002-15) #114

Closed

Description

@shipmill-romamo

Builds part of spec S-002, docs/specs/002-component-build-steps.md (feature issue #86): the acceptance criteria below. Each needs a test that names its id (test_s002_<k>_..., or a proves: S-002-14 comment line).

  • S-002-14: cloudfall config validate on a Component with runtime.type: node, runtime.type: pm2, or runtime.packageManager of npm, pnpm or yarn exits CONFIG_INVALID with code component_runtime_unsupported naming the field
  • S-002-15: Importing a Render blueprint with a Node web service writes no Component for it and lists the service as an unsupported gap

Activity

  1. shipmill-romamo commented on Oct 27, 2026

    @shipmill-romamo
    ContributorAuthor

    Triage: implement, for the next release candidate.

    The plan: build the criteria listed in the body, as docs/specs/002-component-build-steps.md (S-002, approved in #98) says, each with a test that names its id. A departure from a criterion goes back as a question, never a quiet change. Build issues start in order: this one starts once every issue on its Depends on lines has closed. I'll link the PR here.

  2. shipmill-romamo commented on Oct 27, 2026

    @shipmill-romamo
    ContributorAuthor

    The build is in #132: config validate refuses a Node runtime or a non-uv package manager with component_runtime_unsupported, and the Render importer lists a Node service as an unsupported gap instead of writing a Component. Configs that declare a Node runtime and validate today are refused from this release on, as S-002-14 asks; none in this repo does. This issue closes when #132 merges.

  3. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Oct 27, 2026
    c10c222
    f9d02cc
  4. shipmill-romamo commented on Oct 27, 2026

    @shipmill-romamo
    ContributorAuthor

    Released in v0.8.0rc6 (pre-release). uv tool install --prerelease allow cloudfall==0.8.0rc6
    A plain install gets it with the next stable release.
    If you filed this: react 👍 on this comment once it works for you, or reply if it doesn't.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions