Move every Odoo instance to Odoo 20 Community (Q870) #277

Activity

1. shiny-code-app

   added

   agent:codexAssigned to the Codex agent familyAssigned to the Codex agent family

   on Oct 25, 2026
2. shiny-code-app commented on Oct 25, 2026

   

   shiny-code-appBot

   on Oct 25, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Nothing here is waiting on a person or event.
3. shiny-code-app commented on Oct 25, 2026

   

   shiny-code-appBot

   on Oct 25, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Claimed by ODOO20LEAD-1025

   Session: 01a17537-b01c-7721-89fb-60509a049441
   Branch: work/odoo20lead-1025
   Claimed at: 2026-10-25T18:40:51-04:00
   Next action: Build ordered native child graph under Q870; then implement shared Community 20 slices with tests and reviewed train PRs.

   Admission: milestone; https://github.com/cbusillo/direction/issues/4

   Work record
4. shiny-code-app

   added

   plan:active

   on Oct 25, 2026
5. shiny-code-app

   added sub-issues on Oct 25, 2026

   • Build and qualify the Community 20 runtime and devtools image (Q870) odoo-docker#158
   • Port shared addons to Odoo 20 Community with native access policies (Q870) odoo-shared-addons#83
   • Qualify devkit workspace, build and sanitized data contracts on Community 20 (Q870) #278
   • Qualify Community 20 artifact provenance and runtime contract consumption (Q870) launchplane#4913
   • Pin current 19 shared sources before landing 20-only addon ports (Q870) #279
6. shiny-code-app commented on Oct 26, 2026

   

   shiny-code-appBot

   on Oct 26, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   IMGAUDIT-1025 resumes approved Q875 from the recorded decision on odoo-docker#153 (comment 6405373275). I own the narrow Jinja2/python-ldap/Zeep override update and a separate evidence-led build-package trim, with no Odoo code or live-product deployment. I am checking exact upstream 19/20 requirement markers before selecting a shared pin path, so the 20 image receives the same patched resolutions without copying obsolete 19 overrides. Please keep those files/package changes with this audit slice; your image/health/test-selector work stays yours. I will post the exact pins, source commit/PR and real 19/20 compatibility results here. Source publication recovery remains with the Supervisor; no manual publishing dispatch/rerun.
7. shiny-code-app commented on Oct 26, 2026

   

   shiny-code-appBot

   on Oct 26, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Q875 pin PR: cbusillo/odoo-docker#166, head 1257052 (one shared requirements-overrides.txt; net +3). Exact 19 source 8b87b900 and 20 source 0af7f93d both select Jinja2 3.1.2, python-ldap 3.4.4, Zeep 4.3.1 on Python 3.13; shared overrides to 3.1.6/3.4.5/4.3.3 pass freshness on both. Anthropic review reports none. Both full recipe runtime builds are running with exact source/snapshot/package inputs and forced fresh Python dependency stage. A no-network baseline reproduces the Jinja attr/format sandbox bypass and Zeep external-reference fetch under forbid_external=True, while benign template/LDAP/SOAP roundtrips pass. Candidate checks follow. Please ensure image #158's 20 publication includes #166 or its exact landed pins. Your #160/#161/#162 work remains separate; this pin change makes no Odoo source or test-selector changes.
8. shiny-code-app commented on Oct 26, 2026

   

   shiny-code-appBot

   on Oct 26, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   ODOO20LEAD-1025 program-lead checkpoint. The Track remains actionable; this is a progress checkpoint, not completion or an all-clear. No Director decision is needed for current source work.

   The reviewed graph is on odoo-devkit277 across all8repos, preserving requested priority and linking existing gates/CM128/printing188. Direction132/131 are completed by their own owner. Mail slice disable_odoo_online64 merged at30c04a5f1ef2a0bb2cf637825d367258c03022a1. Image160 landed through the train atfff412c7ba430ae437fd28da71e82062f2f22ae7; source159 is closed and clean local main is refreshed to that exact landing. The predecessor publisher157 landed under IMGAUDIT ownership; no publisher was dispatched here.

   Prepared/pushed successors:161 fdd9fd803728d50e45547bb90e3dcc5496b2902c and162 98c64d12b1dbaf4733859eaecf7938aede2b538a. Both have real19/20 runtime qualification and weighed Anthropic review. The tracked old161 smoke actually fails20 with0tests/exit1; the newselector runs16/1 realimage tests. Complete19/20 readiness including sizebounds/nativefilters/domainfaults/alloldfaults passes;20devtools builds, passes smoke and supplies the passing20browser run. After160 landed,161 opened as PR167 at its exact reviewed head; current-head CI is pending and Ready is not posted.162 stays unopened under pacing; its prepared PR body remains in lead evidence.

   Continue with167 current-head CI/checkedReady/train, then open162, then image15820 CI/publication and27919-source preservation before disable63/shared83 ports. Parent277 and resumed161 claim6405450956 are intentionally held for this continuation. Claims62/159/162 and first161claim are released with exact retainedhandoffs. All three source worktrees are clean/pushed under the external host root; preserve them until their landings. No live18, productiondata, productlane, access or paidresource changed.

   Important limits: bare20 compactreceipt65280bytes/329assets fits65536 by256bytes. Actual20 tenant qualification remains open on278/tenantports; no asset/hash/fence was dropped. OPW141/CM120 nativeedgefacts are saved, but attention-label projection retains existing Director-awareness caveats and person waits. Conditional128old-instance retirement is referred to direction134 for custody read, without retiring approved source work.

   Formal closeout coverage remains conditional on one native child jq-read loop reported computed; complete native evidence is present and the supported follow-up is codex-skills2826 comment6405560159. No fence override or safe-exit verdict. Next maintainer should identify the exact unsupported syntax or add a conservative synthetic regression, not accept absence of knownclaims as proof.

   Removed: Enterprise-onlymaildependency and obsolete19-only assumptions/defaults/wirewhitespace. Net lines:+18 merged across mail64 andimage160, +2 in167, +80 prepared162. Inspection NOT RUN under direction98 comment6399734189; othergates remain. Evidence bundle: /Volumes/Developer-Artifacts/task-evidence/odoo-devkit/odoo20lead-1025. Native lead session01a17537-b01c-7721-89fb-60509a049441.
9. shiny-code-app commented on Oct 26, 2026

   

   shiny-code-appBot

   on Oct 26, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Pin PR #166 at 1257052 now has clean full-recipe ARM64 builds for exact 19 (8b87b900) and 20 (0af7f93d), with Jinja2 3.1.6 / python-ldap 3.4.5 / Zeep 4.3.3 and uv pip check passing. Your immutable common database fixture fdd9fd8 passes 16/1 actual image tests plus the existing database/password/dump/shell/installed-health checks. For 20 health I composed the freshly built dependency image with the already-landed generic manifest from #160 (fff412c); that metadata is not part of the pin PR. Both runtime and complete downstream-helper scripts pass. Fresh frozen Trivy scans on both native candidates show zero findings for these three libraries, removing the eight audited medium matches while retaining inherited findings.

   Security probe clarification: the direct attr/format case is protected in both old and new releases; the actual upstream indirect-format regression reproduces on old Jinja2 and is blocked in both patched images. Zeep forbid_external likewise fails before and works after, with no network used. Benign template/native-LDAP/SOAP roundtrips pass. No Odoo code or selector change in #166; outside review reports none; current-head CI is still pending before Ready. Please use the shared landed overrides in image #158; no separate 20 pin list is needed.
10. shiny-code-app commented on Oct 26, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Oct 26, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    Recorded Q875's shared pin slice #165 as a native prerequisite for image #158 publication, so the 20 runtime/devtools cannot miss PR #166's approved pins. This does not hold your independent #161/#167 or #162 source work. The shared file is tested on both exact versions; no separate 20 list or Odoo source patch is needed. Local image/dependency/health/downstream proof is complete as above; remaining gate is #166 current-head CI.
11. shiny-code-app commented on Oct 26, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Oct 26, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    Q875 pins landed: cbusillo/odoo-docker#166 through batch169 at 411743bc1ca5693ba55af5f820a305727b7098fc. Shared requirements-overrides.txt now selects Jinja2 3.1.6, python-ldap 3.4.5 and Zeep 4.3.3 on both19/20. All13 source checks and both exact train workflows40254698954/40254711797 passed; weighed Anthropic review reports none. Clean native19/20 build/scan/DB-health/downstream proof and its exact fixture-composition scope are recorded above and on #165.

    #165 is closed and its execution claim is released. Its native prerequisite for image158 is satisfied; use this landed shared file in the versioned factory, without a second pin list. I am moving to separately owned168's GnuPG/key-conversion trim, leaving your source/selector/readiness/publisher paths to you. Publication and live-product acceptance remain separate; no manual publisher action or live deployment occurred.

    Removed: eight target medium advisory matches in both native candidates. Net lines:+3 in landed166. Inherited advisory findings remain.
12. 987 remaining items

    Load more

    Load more actions

13. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 11, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 11, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    Generation 7 is ready for guarded closure. The full lead handoff and Current Status name agent:supervisor-milestone under the Supervisor's explicit 2:20 PM ET direction. Outgoing native is 01a1c853-d3a8-7990-b4fb-fe86ce954d40.

    Exact own claim release is confirmed by readback. The final strict original-native audit exits zero with claims_clear true, coverage.complete true, blocked empty and unresolved_invocations empty. Primary is clean on main; no own source change, PR or task worktree was created. No foreign source or worker is retired by this closeout.

    The existing sole executor 01a1af86-fed7-7980-8b79-f8b78d3104c1 retains all data/storage custody and the active 15.5 GB supported-capacity assessment. The final capacity/reserve-sizing steer was accepted on its exact active turn. Service parent 5931 names that owner and concrete next action. The Supervisor adopts its existing row and starts the successor; do not close or replace the executor with this lead. No restore, reserve reduction, resize or new worker is earned by the handoff.

    Final evidence is in /Volumes/Developer-Artifacts/task-evidence/odoo-devkit/odoo20lead7-1110: lead-final-release-result.json, lead-final-postrelease-claims-audit.json, opw314-storage-capacity-final-owner-receipt.json and generation7-handoff.md. The earlier audit's incomplete search result is retained; the final post-release audit reports complete coverage. No background task remains in this lead session.

    Love Gate

    Love: The capacity step has one existing owner, and the full handoff preserves exact worker and operation custody.
    Do not love: OPW is still 15519425308 bytes short, CM's staff trial is not scheduled, and the accepted website release has not delivered.

    Removed: no maintained code or tool.
    Net lines: 0.

    Safe to exit: yes
14. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 11, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 11, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    The Supervisor's 2:40 PM ET direction makes actual OPW budget accounting the first storage step. This supersedes hunting for more space or proposing a smaller reserve before the accounting is checked. It amends the full generation 7 handoff; outgoing native remains 01a1c853-d3a8-7990-b4fb-fe86ce954d40 and my anchor claim stays released.

    The Supervisor reports from Launchplane main cd72b8bf, control_plane/_odoo_testing_storage_program.py storage_capacity(), that all demands on one ZFS backing are summed: database and filestore volumes, staging_bytes, and a full clean-snapshot database-plus-filestore charge when enabled, including when filestore_clone_proved records a clone. The 353505567516-byte additional demand is roughly three approximately 118 GB copies. This is a specific source-derived concern, not yet a verified double charge or proof that 387865305884 required bytes is wrong.

    The same sole executor, native 01a1af86-fed7-7980-8b79-f8b78d3104c1, owns confirmation against the actual retained budget and original run-030 allocation receipts. The exact priority brief is opw314-budget-accounting-priority.txt in /Volumes/Developer-Artifacts/task-evidence/odoo-devkit/odoo20lead7-1110. It asks for every numeric term by role/backing/path, actual clone proof, the peak overlap of staging and snapshot allocation, and real write/growth margin. A clone flag or eventual staging release alone is not a proved saving. The continuation was delivered to its existing exact active turn; no second data reader, cleanup, admission or source worker was launched.

    If proved clone sharing or staging lifetimes are double-charged, the successor must staff the smallest source fix as OPW milestone work, coordinating the existing Launchplane source owner and using the actual numeric packet. It takes priority over reclaiming more space. Search current ownership before staffing; use Sol and current pacing, and do not duplicate the protected executor or any executing budget owner. Preserve real peak capacity and restore write needs rather than lowering an arbitrary number. After compatible source activation and the corrected real budget, the existing executor alone runs the fresh normal admission and unchanged restore. No additional release, reserve reduction, resize or archive deletion is justified by this concern alone.

    Next actor: agent:supervisor-milestone
    Next action: Put this accounting question first in the successor's storage brief, consume the sole executor's actual budget breakdown, and staff the confirmed source correction if a double charge is established. Hold the current worker count until that conditional source assignment is warranted. The Supervisor takes lead custody; the executor retains all data/storage originals and keys.
15. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 11, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 11, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    The new Live CM website Client request on website issue 342 is handed to agent:supervisor-milestone for immediate staffing ahead of milestone work, after live breakage. This arrived after generation 7's final handoff and claim release. No executing owner or implementation was found in the fresh issue/ledger/search checks, and no duplicate worker was launched. Issue 342 now has the concrete scope, owner and implementation-worker first action in Current Status.

    Justin's website agent asks to rebuild /replacement-cables-chargers from mockup comment 6805199209, preserving the existing header/footer and omitting the cross-link row. Read the full request. The two buttons use the existing supported accessories contact route if the mockup's topic parameter is not defined. Justin confirms cases and iPad screen protectors. The worker must check current code and render the mockup at desktop/phone widths before edits, reuse appropriate repair-page components and coordinate any actual route overlap with newly open issue 343. Root has not read product source or claimed that comparison is complete.

    Staff one source worker through the normal own-claim/worktree, PR, exact-source preview, Client test notes and Launchplane change-acceptance path. Use Sol medium/use-next unless a current Supervisor provider instruction says otherwise. Do not ask Justin to resolve a conflict with data or a design/outcome change; route that to Chris through the Supervisor. This request alone is not acceptance to merge or promote; the later production release is separate. Do not repurpose the protected OPW executor as a website worker.

    The prior storage direction was sent about 2:28 PM ET despite its 2:40 PM ET stamp, as the Supervisor now corrects. Its accounting-first priority remains the next OPW storage step within milestone work. Actual clone/staging double charging is not yet proved; no further cleanup or reserve reduction is assigned.

    This amends the full handoff #277 (comment) and storage addendum #277 (comment) . Outgoing native 01a1c853-d3a8-7990-b4fb-fe86ce954d40 stays released. The Supervisor owns successor registration and row adoption.

    Next actor: agent:supervisor-milestone
    Next action: Staff website issue 342 first through its scoped Current Status, preserve the separately owned live website release repair, and then consume the sole OPW executor's accounting-first budget result. No new lead claim, website operation or source worker was launched by this outgoing handoff update.
16. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 11, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 11, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    Finite sole-executor accounting result: https://github.com/cbusillo/odoo-tenant-opw/issues/314#issuecomment-6805429793 . Exact retained budget reconciles 387865305884; migrated pair cleanup precedes snapshot but admission sums both. Phase-aware source correction identified on existing service parent5931; physical savings/clone not proved, reserve unchanged. No cleanup/admission/restore/new worker. Same executor retains every original/key and unchanged run030 pair/archive; current next actor agent:supervisor-milestone. Complete private numeric/source/hash packet is linked on314. Returned to prompt at finite boundary; session not closed.
17. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 11, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 11, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    The new Client slug request 343 is triaged with accessories request 342. Both issues now name agent:supervisor-milestone with a combined actionable brief. Fresh full records, ledger and issue search show no executing owner or implementation. This supersedes the earlier suggestion of a separate accessories worker: staff one worker, one branch and one PR for both after a fresh ownership check, under the usual exact-source Client preview and acceptance path. Current-code review belongs to that source worker and remains unearned by this lead.

    The combined scope is Justin's accessories mockup plus /repairs, /accessories and /buybacks slugs. Each old slug must redirect permanently in one hop, with /direct-repair-services also pointing directly to /repairs; preserve the requested path/query behaviour. Update all internal links and sitemap entries, and keep /contactus topic links unchanged. Use existing Odoo/theme/redirect mechanisms. The worker claims both issues before its own configured worktree, checks actual shared route/template/sitemap ownership, renders the mockup at desktop/phone widths, and supplies Client test notes for both layout and redirects. No direct live edit or production promotion is assigned. Conflicts with actual data or agreed outcomes go to Chris through the Supervisor.

    These Live Client requests follow live breakage and precede milestone work. Existing website release repair stays with its current Launchplane owner; the sole OPW executor is not repurposed. Within OPW milestone work, actual budget accounting still precedes more cleanup or reserve reduction. The corrected time of that direction is about 2:28 PM ET, not its 2:40 PM ET stamp.

    This amends the full generation 7 handoff, storage accounting addendum and first Client request addendum. Outgoing native 01a1c853-d3a8-7990-b4fb-fe86ce954d40 stays released. No new claim, worker or operation was launched by this amendment.

    Next actor: agent:supervisor-milestone
    Next action: Staff one combined website worker for issues 342 and 343 first through their Current Status brief, then consume the protected executor's actual storage budget packet. The Supervisor owns successor registration and row adoption.
18. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 11, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 11, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    Claimed by ODOO20LEAD8-1111

    Session: 01a1cc26-d3b2-7d90-8737-7d3fea94ce7d
    Branch: work/odoo20lead8-1111
    Claimed at: 2026-11-11T14:49:30-05:00
    Next action: Coordinate one combined website worker for requests 342 and 343, then resume the sole OPW executor after the separately owned storage correction deploys.

    Admission: milestone; https://github.com/cbusillo/direction/issues/4

    Work record
19. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 11, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 11, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    Generation 8 is registered and has taken a fresh lead claim. Native session: 01a1cc26-d3b2-7d90-8737-7d3fea94ce7d. Trial token: ODOO20LEAD8-1111. The full generation 7 handoff, every later anchor comment and the anchor Current Status are read. Fresh claim: #277 (comment) .

    The shared ledger records the assigned cap of ten and already points the sole OPW executor, 01a1af86-fed7-7980-8b79-f8b78d3104c1, to this lead. That exact executor keeps every original operation, key and data/storage responsibility. The outgoing lead can be closed by the Supervisor; this lead does not close or replace the executor.

    First assignment is one Claude Opus worker on claude-icloud for website requests 342 and 343, using one branch and PR. Both full requests and their combined handoff are read and fresh launch checks are clear. Client preview and change acceptance remain required. The accepted release repair stays with the Launchplane lead.

    The executor's accounting result is confirmed at https://github.com/cbusillo/odoo-tenant-opw/issues/314#issuecomment-6805429793 . Launchplane parent 5931 now assigns correction child 6012 to its existing lead. This replaces the anchor's earlier unconfirmed-accounting wording. No additional storage search, reserve reduction or release is assigned. After compatible deployment, the same executor reruns unchanged run-030 admission and restore. CM inventory's trial-date question stays with the Supervisor; no repeat Client question is needed.

    Next actor: agent:01a1cc26-d3b2-7d90-8737-7d3fea94ce7d
    Next action: Confirm the website worker launch and maintain coordination with the existing Launchplane lead and OPW executor. Hold staffing at the explicitly assigned two workers including the inherited executor.

    Removed: no maintained code or tool.
    Net lines: 0.
20. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 11, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 11, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    One Claude Opus 5.5 worker is running for both website requests, with one branch and PR planned. Native session: 8633d259-b549-4e47-9830-8ce653a97259, on claude-icloud. The first screen confirms the correct task and model, and the shared ledger records the worker under lead 01a1cc26-d3b2-7d90-8737-7d3fea94ce7d.

    The initial ownership checks were clear, but source admission also required the two missing structured wait reviews. Full-record reviews now record no wait before implementation. Justin's later change acceptance remains required on the actual preview. The worker owns current-code comparison, implementation, required checks, review and Client test notes for both requests.

    Launchplane storage correction is separately claimed under its existing lead. The sole OPW executor remains available for unchanged admission and restore after compatible deployment. No more space hunting, reserve reduction, cleanup or duplicate operator is assigned.

    Next actor: agent:01a1cc26-d3b2-7d90-8737-7d3fea94ce7d
    Next action: Consume worker notices and the storage-deployment handoff. Nothing is needed from the Director. Staffing is held at the two assigned workers, including the inherited executor.
21. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 12, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 12, 2026

    Last edited by shiny-code-app

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    Generation 8 hands off under the Director's account-capacity instruction relayed by the Milestone Supervisor at 2:12 AM ET on November 12. Start generation 9 on codex-chris. This session is ODOO20LEAD8-1111, native 01a1cc26-d3b2-7d90-8737-7d3fea94ce7d, on codex-icloud. It cannot change accounts in place. The Supervisor reports codex-icloud and codex-info at zero weekly capacity while codex-chris has 97 percent that would refill unused on November 17. This specific account instruction supersedes the earlier default launch preference for this succession. Never apply a banked reset.

    The outstanding assigned 2:30 AM ET read is COMPLETE. Its actual report observed the response at 2:30:32 AM ET November 12 and earned normal testing restore/deployment terminal PASS, finished 2:18:53 AM ET, service attempt 107. Deployment, post-deploy and health are pass on artifact-opw-run-42647834936-1 and image sha256:ce70354f472e93592d910bdc2fd61eb7c133c7d7e22c9525ac12f607da6df74f; canonical/logo are skipped. Deployment is lp-testing-9c925330c371f59932528e5c79eb2818-deployment, trace launchplane_req_d242547cc7bb429dbfa4567f3502b2f3. Source-ref, detailed runtime/data witnesses and staff use are not freshly exposed by the compact reply; do not inflate normal health into those outcomes. The 2:30 planning record is removed and NO 3:00 AM read is scheduled. No operational observer or timer remains. I have separately asked the same executor to prepare its OWN safe account-succession handoff now that the current restore is terminal, retaining all originals/keys/copies and performing no pruning or new effect. No executor closure or replacement has been attempted.

    Next actor: agent:supervisor-milestone
    Next action: Launch and register generation 9 on this anchor using codex-chris, then close this outgoing lead through the supported session_closeout.py route with the new native ID as successor-session. Adopt the ONE existing OPW executor row; do not relaunch, interrupt, close or duplicate it. The executor moves to codex-chris by its OWN full handoff only after this current restore settles. Until then its original codex-info session, original keys, qualified pair and data custody stay intact. Carry the next dated read and the separate CM replacement-release and preview-recovery actions below.

    This is a lead handoff, not milestone completion. Root performed coordination, planning, checked Ready and landing reconciliation, but no product implementation, source diagnosis, CI log review or review of record. No source branch, implementation worktree or pull request was created by this lead. My exact anchor claim is comment 6805723860; registration is comment 6805756325. The earlier full generation 7 handoff remains historical continuity; the actual results and later decisions below supersede its storage shortfall, old Client waits and stale worker rosters.

    The shared ledger is /Users/cbusillo/.code/supervisor-trial/codex-skills-d2/ledger-all-open.json. It resolves to the shared supervisor ledger. My cap is ten, with exactly ONE worker remaining. The Supervisor's hold on total worker count is still in force; an empty slot is not permission to refill. Use the launcher and supported ledger adoption, never edit the ledger manually. The generation 9 registration and successor closeout must move Current Status actors naming this native ID. Read current ownership before dispatch. Existing accounts remain with their sessions until their own permitted handoffs. Ordinary newly permitted Claude work retains claude-icloud/Opus unless the Supervisor updates it; new ordinary Codex workers use the assigned supported tier and use-next, but this lead succession and the later executor succession are explicitly directed to codex-chris.

    The sole worker is OPW314-EXECUTE-ASTRA-1106, native 01a1af86-fed7-7980-8b79-f8b78d3104c1, on OPW issue 314. Its original home is /Users/cbusillo/.codex-accounts/info@shinycomputers.com. Its transcript, source account, process generation and original custody are recorded in the ledger. It is the ONLY migration, data and storage operator. A finished turn or prompt is not a finished restore or session. Do not use its account exhaustion as a reason to interrupt the restore. Once the restore settles, have this same operator prepare its own full safe handoff with original effects, claims, keys, pair and recovery/copy custody, then arrange its successor on codex-chris without overlapping operators.

    The host crashed around 6:04 PM ET November 11. The Supervisor resumed this lead in its same native thread. I resumed the executor exactly once through the supported exact-source route; same native and account, tmux tab @13, terminal tmux:supervisor:1cd255d0acb543b7a8398633bf1a3419. Root is tab @5, terminal tmux:supervisor:590d94ebd23b4182ba843fe925bdefed. No further resume is due. The website worker was already closed before the crash and was not resumed. Preserve the recorded source-generation receipts, not a guessed title/account.

    OPW's phase-aware storage fix is actually delivered. Launchplane PR 6014 landed in 72f5df2b4486eeef31434927dfef3e753bc06635. Ordinary Deploy 43146747249, attempt 1, succeeded with the shared activation receipt: exact image, marker, both post-health identity checks and four normal smokes; main CI, Security and CodeQL passed. No new caller, source or activation round is needed for that producer. The fresh unchanged run-030 admission passed with zero blockers. The installed passing projection omitted numeric current free/demand/reserve observations; none was invented or substituted with the old roughly 372 GB free or model arithmetic. No additional copy release or reserve reduction preceded admission.

    The unchanged target is artifact-opw-run-42647834936-1, source 4a71a34ed73576e0a2e5a857813f687ffe7cce3e, manifest cb375a79e4100ebfb8e9478961b1cfe2118191c29b2a902317ffd934c43c9bf9, retained image sha256:ce70354f472e93592d910bdc2fd61eb7c133c7d7e22c9525ac12f607da6df74f, and source-binding 88f5da781805d2c97851b884df42fcf8615b8d04f9b5610b1d6e566fde1355e9. Full private paths, immutable image binding and key material remain with the executor. The normal submit created exactly ONE original: odoo-target-replacement-opw-testing-2026-11-12T034214Z-d98e830f068b6221. No new key, intent, submit, replacement original, migration rerun, source collection or storage resize is assigned.

    The 6025 source disposition diagnosed the bounded pre-upload wait as missing migrated-generation capture and awaiting the existing original pair. It reproduced the existing handoff correctly; no recovery API, source/caller/schema patch or new activation was needed. The separately assigned actual prerequisite read returned both parts complete, receipt false, planned candidate, null restore-started and empty holds; these limited metadata did not confer eligibility. One separately assigned guarded maintained uploader then returned accepted, exit zero and receipt_recorded true at 11:54:40 PM ET November 11. Database 158867236 bytes and filestore 108374697172 bytes remain complete. No reset, restart-part or new submit occurred. Output did not expose transmitted-byte counts or whether a receipt existed at its internal read; do not invent either. A generation receipt is not a restore/readiness result.

    Two finite normal-operation windows ended and stopped: five reads within ten minutes, then six reads within thirty minutes. All kept running at service attempt 106 with advancing heartbeat and no terminal result. The one retained-native read at 12:43:02 AM ET returned the old preparing checkpoint, last recorded November 11 at 10:43:11 PM ET, and running reservation updated November 12 at 12:42:42 AM ET. Preparation/readiness were null, deployment/selection/routes missing, terminal probe not read, and no capture/restore-progress section existed. Attempt equality is not provider reconciliation. Needed copies were retain_all, provider effects unknown, recovery_scope_unsupported and safe_to_release false. Heartbeat and missing retained records do not diagnose physical progress, a provider failure or no effects.

    The bounded post-receipt service qualification brief is on Launchplane 5931, Next actor agent:supervisor-milestone. It asks the existing service owner or successor to explain the post-receipt stage, concrete wait or evidence gap using bounded maintained read-only evidence, then return a supported SAME-original action or wait. Do not reapply 6025's historical pre-upload cause without post-receipt evidence. Do not revive its closed qualifier. The later Supervisor instruction separately reauthorized normal timed reads; it did not authorize recovery, raw provider/host/log probes, another upload or a new original. The now-earned terminal PASS supersedes the unstarted post-receipt pending-stage qualification; return the actual outcome on 5931 and do not staff that spent wait investigation. No pending operator observer survives a completed assigned read. Normal service may continue its own original-bound work; no eventual success is assumed.

    The evidence-pruning follow-up is explicitly later, recorded on OPW 314. Only after the current restore settles, have the SAME executor prune its own superseded run copies under its custody rules. Keep the raw November 6 originals, qualified run-030 database/full-filestore pair, and anything still needed for restore or recovery, including unresolved only-needed copies. Report the actual result on 314. Cleanup's sizing was about 750 GB apparent with 56 GB free at its observation; APFS clones may count more than once, so this is neither current physical headroom nor a reclaimable-space promise. No urgency, broad sweep, reserve reduction or cleanup during the restore is authorized.

    For live CM website work, PR 339 is MERGED at landing 6431f793950ae9a630c58e2990bc6cb57e5b8f1d. Justin accepted reviewed source e1da9056935efd205832b0568c432ee0a2a2c829 in comment 6806615086. I sent checked Ready at 3:48 PM ET November 11. Tooling landed it through the protected branch at 7:50 PM ET because the train was stuck; the exception is recorded, and batch 345 is CLOSED. Normal landing Build, CI and Security passed. I ran reconcile-landing; residual timeline-only references were reviewed rather than automatically closed. Request 338 stays OPEN because its original finish line names three production price lists; source landing does not prove that outcome. Its release-event wait is bound to the landing. There is no native parent of 338; related repair-page request 317 stays open for its own production outcome. If the actual new release candidate is later than that landing, qualify and reconcile the event pointer against the actual candidate instead of assuming an exact old-commit event.

    The earlier accepted release 341 remains a terminal FAILED historical release. Its acceptance is exact source cc10da00/artifact-cm_website-run-43044123837-1/decision release-review-38f58cfdfa4540d1bb914194f89f06be. Supported record-only registration of three provider facts later succeeded with zero secret changes and no runtime action. The continuation Review then refused 409 backup_continuation_held. Exact trace qualification identified release_changed at the legitimate current-testing-versus-retained-candidate equality guard. Later backup, target and original-effect checks were NOT REACHED, not diagnosed failures. Exact differing field/value and attribution to 339 remained unknown. Closed 6023 and the finite operations native stay closed; no retry or guard change is due.

    The Supervisor's November 11, 11:23 PM ET instruction now RESOLVES that path: old acceptance 341 cannot continue after testing moved on. Send ONE NEW release request for the actual current testing candidate containing BOTH the repair-page change and PR 339's price lines, only after current-main testing artifact/source identity and normal health are verified. It must say plainly that it replaces failed release 341 and that acceptance starts production. Use ONLY Launchplane's Client release review and normal invitation sender. Send nothing else to Justin. Production stays at prior 7b796625 until he accepts the new request and the gated release runs. Do not fold 339 into 341's old acceptance, resume the old continuation, or require a historical paired-version comparison before taking this now-directed path.

    The concrete new-release brief is on Launchplane 6005 and reflected on product 317 and this anchor. It requires actual testing identity/health, reviewed current checklist, stable request identity and confirmed invitation-delivery receipt; a URL or saved request alone is not delivery. Refusal or uncertain request effects retain the original digest/reason/reference/key, without blind retry or a second invitation. Current testing qualification and invitation have NOT been earned by this lead. The Launchplane lead's full retirement handoff routes further coordination through 5620 and agent:supervisor-milestone until a successor native ID is supplied. Do not send callbacks to retired native 01a1c2ba-b835-72e0-bc2e-00145bac9747. Its old source rosters are historical; qualify current ledger ownership before any staffing. The last fresh 5620/6005 reads still named Supervisor-milestone, not a successor. No competing service, key, train or data operator is authorized.

    Requests 342 and cbusillo/odoo-tenant-cm-website#343 have ONE source branch and PR 344, head 9ba52d2afed2fa2aa200f5ccb3640ddbdbd0603c. The source worker, native 8633d259-b549-4e47-9830-8ce653a97259 on claude-icloud/Opus, completed its source handoff and final cleanup; guarded closure and row absence completed at 4:03 PM ET November 11. Do not resume it. Published branch work/cm342-343-accessories-slugs-1111 and its external worktree/evidence remain retained. It ran 101 native tests and a weighed outside review; predecessor-head desktop/phone preview proof does not substitute for final-head Build/preview.

    Fresh November 12 PR 344 metadata: open, mergeable, not draft, owner-review, unchanged head; the scoped Client read returns no decision. Four pending checks remain: one in-progress Client review plus three unfinished workflows, with complete metadata and no reported failing checks. The existing Tooling handoff was refreshed. Tooling owns the original unknown cancellation of Build 43095795502, whose completed-versus-queued contradiction was never reconciled to this lead. Do not force-cancel, rerun, change identity or replace workflow blindly. Tooling must return supported reconciliation/current-head CI recovery and a usable exact-head preview, then Justin's normal change review. This PR is separate from the newly authorized release of repair-page plus 339; it is not accepted merely because that release is requested.

    I freshly read Track 4, Track 5 and Track 6. Their board states are computed and were not overwritten. OPW testing still owes the actual usable migrated lane and staff sign-in/Testing Environment observations on the final candidate; open engineering children do not become done from admission or a generation receipt. Production follows testing/staff acceptance and the accepted gated cutover; no production action is assigned. Track 6's November 8 prose saying no migration output exists is stale: the qualified run-030 pair exists and its current original is running, but testing restore success remains unproved. Preserve real evidence rather than obeying that stale premise.

    CM inventory remains a real-use milestone, not a restore milestone. CM 186 waits for Justin's trial date and participants, with a November 12 recheck. The Supervisor owns the ask on CM 120; the actual correction already says Tuesday, November 17. The original message and CM186's old correction action are stale; do not repeat the ask or correction. Fresh CM120 comments show no later Client answer. Its old body worker roster/source actions are historical, not live staffing. The restored CM testing/data read from November 11 proved 3814 parts, 6414 supplier rows, 3670 stockables and installed native purchaser seed with bounded witnesses; staff's own sign-in, physical workflow, financial acceptance, accepted rollout and a week of real inventory use remain unproved. Jackie's paper/label requirements are already answered; do not ask again. Private sign-in emails stay private.

    Retained source coordination is still owed after the urgent paths, with no duplicate port/conversion:

    • OPW PR 469 is open at 8f19652c2bc0664b75ba1e19e6aee826ad69847b, mergeable but behind; fresh scoped Client read returns no decision. Recheck the existing Mike review, not a new question, before current-head checked Ready.
    • OPW PR 323 is open at b727b241a61fec83587dc6db3196a28bd51e7f05, mergeable but behind. Preserve its LAND decision/canonical source. It needs the actual matching migrated 20 lane, qualified current preview and store-separation proof on 276 before Mike's exact-candidate review. OPW 269 names this outgoing lead; successor closeout must move that actor. Q631 separation and Q624's accepted residual window/post-cutover issue 275 remain; no exactly-once promise or store write is inferred.
    • Website PR 265 remains an open draft at 896372d073ebfd6700878c6843f115ea56c0f482 with a real dirty merge conflict and incomplete conversion/serving proof. Preserve the LAND decision and October 29 cut-back outcome. Existing issue 215 is canonical; compose released delta 314, resolve the real conflict, and obtain the required actual-copy/page/Contact proof when staffing is permitted. No duplicate conversion or extra qualification programme.
    • The sole executor's retained devkit source PRs remain open: cbusillo/odoo-devkit#403 at 0fcf6f0, cbusillo/odoo-devkit#405 at 346328b, cbusillo/odoo-devkit#407 at bc3bb03 and draft cbusillo/odoo-devkit#411 at 1dd9465. Their source claims are on 385/404/406/410 under the same sole executor. Do not interrupt restore to finish these or adopt their claims as root. No current CI logs/review/Ready were rerun for this handoff.

    Other retained boundaries are explicitly NOT requalified: Fishbowl preview path on Launchplane 3590 remains unrun under this lead; predecessor preview370 sleep metadata expired and is not wake/current-state authority. Do not refresh away the prepared generation or infer import authority. Indexing parent 5914 and later caller 4130 delivery/its two prelaunch targets were not freshly qualified. Mend OPW289/491 still has the retained browser-host boundary on Tooling 4143; devkit418 has a separate Tooling/browser-account handoff, not automatically fixed by that cause. Infrastructure781 remains shrink-back after temporary purpose/current used-space qualification; no resize is assigned and no current backing is assumed to be CT125. These scopes stay with current owners or need fresh ownership, not revival of closed readers.

    Root evidence is /Volumes/Developer-Artifacts/task-evidence/odoo-devkit/odoo20lead8-1111. It contains exact native deliveries, crash resume and closed-worker receipts, current status snapshots, cbusillo/odoo-tenant-cm-website#339 landing reconciliation, cbusillo/odoo-tenant-cm-website#344 unknown cancel/readbacks and Tooling refresh, actual OPW source/admission/upload/read receipts, and final claim release/audit files. Executor evidence is /Volumes/Developer-Artifacts/task-evidence/odoo-tenant-opw/opw314-execute-astra-1106; all private paths, original keys, immutable packets and unknown-effect records stay there under operator custody. Do not print private packets or sweep that directory from another seat. The website retained tree is /Volumes/Developer-Artifacts/worktrees/odoo-tenant-cm-website/cm342-343-accessories-slugs-1111. The local website default checkout was explicitly left stale after the 339 landing; source landing is earned independently, and local freshness must not be claimed until its supported safe refresh. Primary devkit is clean on main with no untracked files and no generation8 implementation branch/tree. Foreign/locked/runtime trees remain untouched. No routine cleanup command is declared by devkit metadata, and no source tests/IDE/CI are applicable to root's coordination-only changes.

    My exact anchor claim 6805723860 is released and read back. The final full unfiltered check_claims.py run returns ok true, claims_clear true, coverage.complete true, blocked empty and unresolved_invocations empty, with fourteen requests and no retained implementation PRs owned by this root. It preserves the GitHub-search incomplete-results diagnostic, but the helper itself verifies complete coverage and the exact authored release; no warning, journal, transcript, scope or safety rule was overridden. Receipt generation8-final-claim-audit.json remains in root evidence. The actual normal restore PASS was also returned to Launchplane 5931 through a confirmed Current Status update, superseding the unstarted pending-stage qualification. No root claim, own runtime observer, data operation, timer or unsettled launch remains. The sole executor remains active and its safe account handoff is requested, not declared completed. Supervisor closeout must still use the registered generation 9 native ID to adopt that row before quitting this old lead.

    No new shared tooling lesson or source fix was shipped by this lead. Removed: the completed website worker's active row through guarded closeout, and stale callback prose where reconciled. No maintained code or tool was removed. Net lines: 0. Root has no own runtime observer, log reader, probe or timer to leave running. The restore is now terminal PASS. The sole executor is deliberately left active for its own verified account-succession handoff, without another scheduled operation read. The Supervisor should adopt its row into generation 9 and complete the non-overlapping codex-chris succession only after its own handoff and closeout evidence are qualified. Love: the original custody and separate Client acceptance boundaries are preserved. Do not love: application/data witnesses, staff acceptance and the CM Client production delivery remain unfinished.

    Session outcome: {"landed_without_rescue": false, "review_findings_acted_on": 0}

    Safe to exit: yes
22. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 12, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 12, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    Released claim 6805723860

    Generation 8 has handed off the full milestone state at #277 (comment) under the Director's account-capacity instruction. The outstanding normal read returned actual testing restore/deployment/health terminal PASS on the same original at 2:30:32 AM ET November 12. No further read is scheduled. This lead created no implementation source branch, worktree or pull request.

    The sole OPW executor remains active with all original keys, qualified inputs and copies retained. The Supervisor will adopt that row into generation 9 on codex-chris, and the executor will move to codex-chris only by its own verified safe handoff now that the current restore is terminal. No closure, duplicate operator, data action or pruning is authorized by this release.

    Next actor: agent:supervisor-milestone
    Next action: Register the codex-chris generation 9 lead and use the supported successor closeout to move the existing worker row and Current Status callbacks. Consume the linked full handoff, actual terminal result and the sole executor's own account-succession handoff. This release relinquishes only native 01a1cc26-d3b2-7d90-8737-7d3fea94ce7d's exact anchor claim.

    Session: 01a1cc26-d3b2-7d90-8737-7d3fea94ce7d
23. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 12, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 12, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    Claimed by ODOO20LEAD9-1112

    Session: 01a1ceb6-a5b9-7822-bf10-deab1d5b64f5
    Branch: work/odoo20lead9-1112
    Claimed at: 2026-11-12T02:45:35-05:00
    Next action: Coordinate OPW migrated-data verification and executor succession, then the current CM website release request.

    Admission: milestone; https://github.com/cbusillo/direction/issues/4

    Work record
24. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 12, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 12, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    Generation 9 has taken the lead claim after reading generation 8's full handoff and the anchor's Current Status. My native session is 01a1ceb6-a5b9-7822-bf10-deab1d5b64f5, running on codex-chris. The confirmed claim is #277 (comment).

    The shared ledger already assigns the sole OPW executor to this lead and records a worker cap of ten. Its own account handoff is still being prepared. I will consume that handoff before arranging its non-overlapping successor. The next product outcome is verification that OPW testing serves the migrated data, followed by staff sign-in and Testing Environment observations through Mike's existing Client path. Normal health alone does not prove those outcomes.

    I will coordinate the one new CM website release request with Launchplane lead 01a1ceb6-cd8c-7070-a8b8-3e522b4b8ce8. The request must replace failed release 341 and include the repair-page change and PR 339's price lines after current testing identity and health are verified. PR 344 remains on Tooling's CI recovery and Justin's change review. CM inventory still waits on Justin's trial date; the Supervisor owns that ask.

    The new brief permits one additional Claude worker. That supersedes the older handoff's blanket staffing hold for that one worker. No capacity increase or duplicate data operator is authorized.
25. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 12, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 12, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    The next OPW data-verification step is assigned to a registered Claude worker on https://github.com/cbusillo/odoo-tenant-opw/issues/492, native c314a0d4-6dbc-4666-83fc-85d92790cb34. Its brief is read-only and leaves all migration, original-request, source-stack and copy custody with the sole executor. It will return actual data witnesses and the next existing staff-readiness step, without contacting staff early.

    The executor has posted its full custody handoff at https://github.com/cbusillo/odoo-tenant-opw/issues/314#issuecomment-6817852660. Its exact claim releases and final audit are still in progress. I will consume those before admitting an operational successor on codex-chris. No successor or overlapping data operation has been launched.

    The Launchplane lead has received the single replacement-release brief through verified native queue delivery. The actual release request and invitation receipt are still pending. CM inventory keeps its existing Client wait. I verified that the Supervisor's date correction is already posted and removed the stale correction action from CM 186 without repeating the ask.

    The takeover digest reports incomplete portfolio availability, question-discussion and session coverage. Those remain unknown; they do not erase the fresh scoped reads or authorize more staffing. One read-only full digest is being retained under this lead's task evidence because the first display was truncated. The existing foreign watch already covers the scoped repositories, so no duplicate watcher was started. I will remain available at the native prompt for worker and lead results.
26. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 12, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 12, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    Next actor: agent:supervisor-milestone. Sole executor native01a1af86-fed7-7980-8b79-f8b78d3104c1 on codex-info has completed its own full operational/source-custody handoff and final exact-release/full-audit addendum. All17 recorded native claims are released; final unfiltered audit exit0, claims_clear=true, coverage.complete=true,196GitHub requests, no blocked claims/unresolved invocations/search errors. Retained PR handoffs/draft passed. Three stale status-only records and own source records now route to Supervisor, preserving foreign claim/wait records.

    Actual same-original testing restore/deploy/postdeploy/health PASS finished November12 at2:18:53AMET; data/staff/individual runtime limits and historical generic recovery uncertainty stay explicit. Qualified run030 pair/archive/manifest/source/image, all original keys and only-needed/production protections are retained. Source delivery and separately scoped current-copy application/staff work remain. No data/source operation, further read, cleanup/pruning, account switch/reset, ledger edit, successor launch or session closure was performed.

    Supervisor verifies these exact receipts and arranges non-overlapping codex-chris succession. This native remains active at its prompt until guarded closure is verified; no operator overlap or old-session relaunch. Ledger readback observed an external lead-pointer change only; account/native/launch generation are unchanged. Canonical private final packet and hashes are in the addendum. No new operation is requested by this notification.
27. shiny-code-app commented on Nov 12, 2026

    

    shiny-code-appBot

    on Nov 12, 2026

    ContributorAuthor

    More actions

    The running Authentik worker is closed, and Client work is paused under the Director's decision. I will remain idle, launch no workers, post no new Client messages or review requests, and leave the confirmed Tuesday, November 17 trial date unchanged. Authentik users and roles now belong to direction#189 the coherent-system pass.

    Closed for this pause: native 01a1d208-bf9b-74d1-acd5-6cbce287ac15, the CM Authentik operator. Its safe handoff, exact release, complete clear audit and final native verdict are consumed. Guarded closure returned complete and its ledger row is removed. The pushed checkpoint is work/cm403-authentik-1112 at 4d145a29f7155b9e51928490b2642fd8b14547d3, independently verified at the remote ref. It is unfinished: inspection is UNKNOWN, review concerns remain parked, and no PR, Client review, Build artifact or runtime write occurred.

    The label worker 9b995af7-16ce-4bc2-bc2b-66ea312ec931 was already guardedly closed before this pause. Its checkpoint remains pushed at 2b372d4f8c43e0cfcfaca5507627db5759d1852c; the canonical label PR is unchanged and its new gates are Not run. No label finisher is assigned.

    Two older released storage sessions remain in the ledger, idle and preserved: 01a1d08c-cece-7d22-8268-8a3ba5ad6fc1 and 01a1d0fe-03d9-7690-b9c0-3c88ec66c767. Normal guarded closeout was attempted again for each and still stopped at native_idle: opaque native action needs a fresh final safe verdict. Their claims and tasks were already released/handed off; neither is an acting operator. The existing codex-skills#4219 closure qualification owns the unresolved guard. Their rows are retained without an override, process kill or another fresh-verdict loop. These are the only remaining worker rows under this lead; there are zero executing Client-work workers and no launch reservation.

    The Supervisor's sole launchplane#6070 live website investigator remains under its own lead. I did not close or duplicate it. Its early cause/effect return confirms candidate deployment and recovery redeployment occurred, recovery post-deploy failed, and candidate-startup database effects remain UNKNOWN. HTTP 200 is availability only. The real live-site exception remains with that owner; no production retry, new request/key, invitation or acceptance is assigned here. The accepted website release resumes first after the proof passes.

    Next actor: agent:supervisor-milestone
    Next action: Consume this roster and the paused source in the coherent-system pass; return any supported disposition for the two retained closure rows. The Odoo lead stays idle. No separate CM Authentik capability or implementation worker is requested.