You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's possible, and there is the MIC detection which is AVX-512. Is MIC the only cpu which implements AVX-512? But yes, the problem would be that in the current arrangement it would not be possible to define the individual subsets. It would have to be a single version number to identify it. Perhaps it could be an alternate/alias to MIC? @jfalcou and @ccharly what do you think?
My stance on this matter as I tried to implement that in SPY :
Have a AVX512 detection macro ghat basically means you have 512 bits simd register
have a boolean macro for each sub system because avx512F does not mean Avx512dq is here
Alternatively, we could have a version number for avx like 50000 and use bit field in the lower bits to mask tets each subsystem. This means maybe more macro
Activity
grafikrobot commentedon Feb 29, 2020
It's possible, and there is the MIC detection which is AVX-512. Is MIC the only cpu which implements AVX-512? But yes, the problem would be that in the current arrangement it would not be possible to define the individual subsets. It would have to be a single version number to identify it. Perhaps it could be an alternate/alias to MIC? @jfalcou and @ccharly what do you think?
jfalcou commentedon Mar 1, 2020
My stance on this matter as I tried to implement that in SPY :
Alternatively, we could have a version number for avx like 50000 and use bit field in the lower bits to mask tets each subsystem. This means maybe more macro