Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 5 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR adds explicit CTO attention statuses across desktop, headless, web, and iOS clients. It preserves known attention state after unknown probes, adds adapter coverage, normalizes Claude SDK responses, updates CTO capability text, and aligns PTY and steering contracts. ChangesCTO attention state and propagation
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~25 minutes Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1📝 Generate docstrings 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@apps/desktop/src/main/services/cto/ctoPromptContent.ts`:
- Line 23: Change the capability heading in
apps/desktop/src/main/services/cto/ctoPromptContent.ts at lines 23-23 to
sentence case, using “# ADE operator tools”; update the corresponding expected
heading in apps/desktop/src/main/services/cto/ctoState.test.ts at lines 279-279
to match.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 2c2437fa-47a6-4fa6-bace-16488973b3a6
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
docs/ARCHITECTURE.mdis excluded by!docs/**docs/features/chat/README.mdis excluded by!docs/**docs/features/cto/README.mdis excluded by!docs/**docs/features/sync-and-multi-device/ios-companion.mdis excluded by!docs/**docs/features/sync-and-multi-device/remote-commands.mdis excluded by!docs/**
📒 Files selected for processing (23)
apps/ade-cli/src/headlessLinearServices.test.tsapps/ade-cli/src/headlessLinearServices.tsapps/desktop/src/main/services/adeActions/registry.tsapps/desktop/src/main/services/ai/tools/ctoOperatorTools.tsapps/desktop/src/main/services/chat/agentChatService.test.tsapps/desktop/src/main/services/chat/agentChatService.tsapps/desktop/src/main/services/chat/claudeSdkCompat.tsapps/desktop/src/main/services/cto/ctoPromptContent.tsapps/desktop/src/main/services/cto/ctoState.test.tsapps/desktop/src/main/services/ipc/registerIpc.tsapps/desktop/src/main/services/sync/syncHostService.test.tsapps/desktop/src/main/services/sync/syncRemoteCommandService.test.tsapps/desktop/src/renderer/browserMock.tsapps/desktop/src/renderer/hooks/useCtoAttention.test.tsxapps/desktop/src/renderer/hooks/useCtoAttention.tsapps/desktop/src/renderer/state/appStore.tsapps/desktop/src/renderer/webclient/adapter/__tests__/adapter.test.tsapps/desktop/src/renderer/webclient/adapter/misc.tsapps/desktop/src/shared/types/cto.tsapps/ios/ADE/App/ContentView.swiftapps/ios/ADE/Models/RemoteModels.swiftapps/ios/ADE/Services/SyncService.swiftapps/ios/ADETests/ADETests.swift
|
@codex review |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 2d4ae9dfd3
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
1 participant
Fixes ADE-136
Linked Linear issues
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests