Skip to content

Merge dev into master: af-core 1.0.11 and resync removal - #2018

Merged
rismehta merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
merge/dev-into-master-2026-11-02-af-core-1.0.11
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

rismehta merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
merge/dev-into-master-2026-11-02-af-core-1.0.11

Conversation

@rismehta

@rismehta rismehta commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description

Merge all current dev changes into master after #2017 was merged.

  • Promotion merge commit: fee58aedf12f08fe0718c04f3a3d03a02e9ad213.
  • First parent (master): 66f7740aef1d4f940a427574f6903882f9756885.
  • Second parent (dev): 6dae19c8d387ec3fb1c629524c260ea4a6dec6b9.

The three-file net change promotes the @aemforms/af-core manifest update to ^1.0.11, its exact committed lockfile from dev (including af-core/af-formatters 1.0.11 and removal of stale extraneous local-workspace entries), and complete removal of .github/workflows/sync-pr.yml.

Conflict resolution: master had added a condition to the resync workflow, while dev deleted the file. Keep the intentional complete deletion requested in #2017. No other conflicts occurred.

Master's existing cooldown exemption, target-branch: dev, CI configuration, release history, 3.0.175-SNAPSHOT project versions, README, and version history are retained. No packages are published or auto-merged.

Merge strategy: use Create a merge commit, not squash/rebase, to preserve the integrated development-branch ancestry. Use GitHub's Update branch for future branch synchronization.

Related Issue

#2013

Promotes #2017; preserves the existing policy from #2016.

Motivation and Context

Promote the complete latest development branch after the released runtime update and resync removal were merged. This retains master-only configuration rather than replacing master with the development tree.

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Passed: mvn -B -o -Pcloud,build-cypress validate on the merged tree; all 19 reactor modules validate successfully.
  • Passed: git diff --cached --check before committing the merge.
  • Passed: git merge-base --is-ancestor adobe/master HEAD and git merge-base --is-ancestor adobe/dev HEAD; both branch snapshots are ancestors of the merge commit.
  • Passed: git diff --exit-code adobe/master HEAD -- .github/dependabot.yml pom.xml parent/pom.xml VERSIONS.md README.md; master policy, parent/reactor release configuration, and release documentation are unchanged.
  • Passed: JSON/YAML merge-contract checks confirm manifest/lockfile byte equality with dev, ^1.0.11 in both manifest and lockfile root, af-core/af-formatters 1.0.11 in both lockfile representations, unchanged master cooldown configuration with PR target dev, complete resync workflow deletion, exactly three changed files, and no unresolved conflicts. Dependabot configuration also validates against its SchemaStore schema.

Not run locally: full Java unit suites, frontend build, or AEM/Cypress application suites. The promotion commit requires its own CI run; validation above is not a claim that the full new workflow has passed.

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Not applicable; branch promotion.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes and the overall coverage did not decrease.
  • All unit tests pass on CircleCi.
  • I ran all tests locally and they pass.

dependabot Bot and others added 2 commits November 2, 2026 18:34
…tend (#2017)

* chore(deps): bump @aemforms/af-core in /ui.frontend

Bumps [@aemforms/af-core]() from 1.0.10 to 1.0.11.

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: "@aemforms/af-core"
  dependency-version: 1.0.11
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>

* chore(ci): temporarily disable automatic PR base resync

Use GitHub Update branch instead of automatically rebasing and force-pushing pull-request branches. Dependabot-triggered resync failed with a read-only workflow token (403). Skip the sync job for all PRs without changing permissions or the af-core dependency update.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore(ci): remove obsolete PR resync workflow

Remove sync-pr.yml entirely instead of retaining a disabled job. Use GitHub Update branch when synchronization is needed.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Rishi Mehta <rismehta@adobe.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Promote all current dev changes from 6dae19c onto master 66f7740. Keep the intentional sync-pr.yml deletion when resolving its modify/delete conflict. Preserve master cooldown policy, dev update target, and release versions.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@rismehta
rismehta merged commit 255fa4c into master Nov 2, 2026
5 of 7 checks passed
@rismehta
rismehta deleted the merge/dev-into-master-2026-11-02-af-core-1.0.11 branch November 2, 2026 13:19
@adobe-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
aria-required-attr critical
empty-heading minor
label-title-only serious
target-size serious

@adobe-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
aria-required-attr critical
empty-heading minor
label-title-only serious
page-has-heading-one moderate
target-size serious

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants