Skip to content

Tiered confidential-compute escalation contract for model-router #22

Description

@mdheller

From the SourceOS-vs-Apple ModelCarry analysis (spec-intake 2026-08-03), section 5.2 medium-term. Apple's on-device to PCC escalation has a named confidential-compute boundary. SourceOS routing tiers need an equivalent: where does an over-scale request go, and under what attested-compute guarantee?

Acceptance criteria

  • An escalation contract (schema + validator) with: local-by-default posture, an attested confidential-compute escalation target, and the trigger condition (task exceeds local capability).
  • The escalation decision and its confidence are propagated as a first-class provenance record (the Palantir-comparison point made operational at the model layer).
  • No-user-data-for-training and end-to-end-encryption posture declared as invariants of the escalation target.
  • Keep uncertainty-with-provenance as a first-class primitive on the escalation path (do not regress the SourceOS differentiator for delivery convenience).
  • Wired into make validate; valid + negative fixtures.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions