v0.3.3 security hardening - #14
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Product impact
Strengthens the v0.3.3 deployment and public API security boundary without changing the FAQ-first product direction or SSE compatibility surface. Production now fails closed on unsafe credentials, public endpoints reject oversized or malformed inputs, anonymous conversation access remains owner-bound, and rendered/exported output is hardened against injection.
Implementation scope
Verification
EMBED_PROVIDER=other npm testEMBED_PROVIDER=other npm run eval:faq— 11/11; Top1 100%, Top3 100%, no-match 100%PLAYWRIGHT_CHANNEL=chromium npm run test:e2e— 48/48EMBED_PROVIDER=other npm run build— passed (5,320 modules)git diff --checkRemaining risks
npm auditreports a React Router RSC/server-action advisory in the dependency graph; this Vite BrowserRouter SPA does not expose the affected RSC/server-action path. Applicability and reasoning are documented in the security review.