[rational_expectations] Update content and styling - #764
Conversation
|
📖 Netlify Preview Ready! Preview URL: https://pr-764--sunny-cactus-210e3e.netlify.app (f2c363d) 📚 Changed Lecture Pages: rational_expectations |
|
🤖 Status note for a future session — from a maintainer investigation on 2026-07-08 into why open-PR previews 404. Context only, not instructions. Netlify preview: https://pr-764--sunny-cactus-210e3e.netlify.app/ currently returns 404. Why previews are down (repo-wide findings)1. This branch is stale — 94 commits behind 2. The arviz failure was a red herring — do NOT pin arviz or rewrite plotting. A 2026-07-07 rebuild also failed in Recommended first step for this PRUpdate this branch to This PR touches: |
📖 Netlify Preview Ready!Preview URL: https://pr-764--sunny-cactus-210e3e.netlify.app Commit: 📚 Changed LecturesBuild Info
|
- Key insight: the Euler equation {eq}`ree_comp7` now carries H(Y_t)
rather than Y_{t+1}, so matching it to the planner's equation
{eq}`comp16` needs the equilibrium condition H(Y_t) = Y_{t+1} as well
as y_t = Y_t. Previously the text claimed the two were identical by
algebra alone, which is no longer true. State the condition explicitly.
- Replace a literal Unicode omega (U+03C9) with \omega in the new
exercise derivation, where the neighbouring integral already used
\omega. MathJax may tolerate the raw character but the LaTeX builder
is unlikely to.
- Add the missing blank lines around that display block; without them
the $$ ran straight into the preceding sentence and into
{solution-end}.
- Blackwell paragraph: fix "intuively", "monotoncity" and "the
Blackwell's", and write the aggregate law of motion as Y_{t+1} rather
than y_{t+1}, since h(Y_t, Y_t) is aggregate output rather than an
individual firm's.
- Add the missing space in a {doc} role, matching the other two in this
lecture.
Co-Authored-By: xuanguang-li <xuanguang-li@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Thanks @xuanguang-li — this one is in good shape, and I've merged current Worth saying first: declining to convert this lecture to JAX was the right call, and the reasoning in the PR description is exactly right. The control problem goes through One substantive fix. Changing the Euler equation {eq}
With
A likely build breaker. In the new derivation for the unit measure of firms, the second integral ended The Blackwell paragraph is a genuinely useful addition and I've kept the argument, with some tidying: Minor: added the missing space in The branch was 57 commits behind |
|
Thanks @xuanguang-li , comments from Claude above. This should be good to merge when green --- I'll do so if it looks good. |
✅ Translation sync completed (zh-cn)Target repo: QuantEcon/lecture-python.zh-cn
|
This pull request makes a series of stylistic and clarity improvements to the
lectures/rational_expectations.mdfile. There are no code changes, as the control problem is solved usingquantecon.LQ, for whichnumpyworks well.Key changes:
Mathematical and technical clarifications:
Formatting and reference improvements: