Skip to content

[Status 05] InferRSI evolution: 1246348f → 8150ee04 (2026-11-13) #423

New issue
New issue
Open
Open
[Status 05] InferRSI evolution: 1246348f → 8150ee04 (2026-11-13)#423
Labels
area:processRepo-wide process, governance, privacy and security ruleskind:statusPeriodic status snapshot

Description

@Dong1017
Dong1017
opened on Nov 13, 2026

Weekly edition for Friday, November 13. The nominal obligation was 17:00 Asia/Shanghai; this check ran after a delayed trigger at 17:20:48. Status 04 was published at 19:12:55 on November 6, so its seven-day edition window would have ended at 19:12:55 today. This Friday report uses the earlier obligation and the actual window from that publication through this check. It does not issue a second edition, and it does not treat the previous evening delay as a new schedule.

1. Snapshot

  • Previous edition Status 04, #366.
  • Observation November 13, 2026, 17:21–17:26 Asia/Shanghai. This check consolidates changes since the prior edition's publication at November 6, 19:12:55. It carries forward the in-week records and adds the later main deliveries. Nov 8 · Nov 9 · Nov 10 · Nov 11 · Nov 12
  • Published body baseline 1246348f252dbc7e473efb1752c2d81da15e23fd.
  • Last published delta main e2f4cd1e39b369f06835cdd655ad5dc9f6808918.
  • Pinned current main 8150ee048af6503070fa71768fbf64dffcc1a77e, 30 commits after the published body and seven after the last delta. Full comparison · Since last delta
  • Reporting window The actual GitHub publication timestamp on November 13 through that timestamp plus seven days, start inclusive and end exclusive, in Asia/Shanghai. The [Roadmap] InferRSI: reusable knowledge, verifiable inference optimization #61 index receipt records the exact bounds after publication.

Seven Knowledge bodies, a single-CPU Harness execute path, and an Apps output/replay slice are now on main, together with shared optimization-management and review tooling. The Apps design is recorded as accepted. First-wave isolation is still incomplete, and the governing K01, H02, and Apps Issues remain open. Contributor campaign receipts are not independent reproductions or goal acceptance.

2. What changed

Already recorded in the Status 04 in-week updates, and still on the ancestry of this main: v0.1.5 and DSH source delivery #361; the November 8 architecture direction; knowledge-audit and packaging work through #359; P0a documentation #391; the P0b gate #395; the H01 RunStore #398; request-profile review tooling #389; and the bounded MindIE read-only slice #393. Those earlier records stay authoritative for their intervals; this edition does not copy them in full.

The seven commits after the last published delta, all now on the pinned main, are:

Change Delivery and acceptance boundary
vLLM-Omni results table in docs #415 merged November 12 20:23:03 Asia/Shanghai by zengchuang-hw, merge commit 34c81b0dfa1b4c21f9d54c715d73dd462e0f321e, head b454918039885f335e6db2ee5ec84b4b678ad219 (1 file, +39/−20). Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459 and cursor[bot]. This is a README documentation change. The PR says the figures come from existing runs, and the table includes unmet targets and quality failures. Merging the table is not a new measurement, not an independent reproduction, and not issue acceptance.
Profile timing and search review UI #401 merged November 12 21:35:45 Asia/Shanghai by david6666666, merge commit 1191ec6b3f4cfb147ec688f80d48f8df10503b52, head 9fea020146c31d609a97342ec26b2c93538c9861 (13 files, +837/−72). Refs #345 and #333, both still open with status:proposed. Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459 and zengchuang-hw. The PR states there are no new GPU measurements or performance claims, and that goal acceptance remains with the issue owners. This is a follow-up to #389, not acceptance of those Issues.
Shared optimization-management entry #338 merged November 12 21:43:29 Asia/Shanghai by Dong1017, merge commit fa3d6421c71cad3be6a918733dfacde1824b1a5e, head 1b616a569871c9d1efbf9a4b3c3bddd725a1aa6a (82 files, +9716/−58). Refs #336, #252 and #337, all still open. Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459 and Dong1017. The PR adds a shared project/benchmark optimization-management path; it does not migrate the legacy run path, SkillEval, or older campaigns into the new controller. The PR body records a 2026-11-12 Qwen-Image knowledge on/off campaign on commit b4a2dd438e96ca6eec60575d66673c7d5dc9c27a, task qwen21-denoise-npu: both arms finished 8 rounds plus an independent final, with author-recorded finals of 1.4806× (knowledge on, 11.9 minutes, 5,454,354 session tokens) and 1.9159× (knowledge off, 19.5 minutes, 7,925,804 session tokens). Later review fixes were not re-run on NPU. Both arms used the RSI Harness; the PR says this is not an RSI versus no-RSI comparison, and that one search is not proof that knowledge is generally ineffective. Those figures are author-recorded receipts, not independently replayed here. Merging the software is not acceptance of #336 or a measured-effect pass.
K01 Knowledge bodies on main #418 merged November 13 08:36:22 Asia/Shanghai by Dong1017, merge commit d7de7f3a7a4c089da08cc17a0117a54d89466dee, head 18271323cd4360809ed25b4cb7ac4689e794eca4 (32 files, +2271/−1936). Refs #407, which remains open. Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459 and david6666666. The seven Knowledge implementations now live under src/inferrsi/knowledge/; root modules remain forwarding shells until R01, and packaged-resource moves remain K02. The PR records overall isolation_complete as false and says merging this PR does not close #407. Manifest revision was submitted for formal review and was not self-approved by the implementer or coordinator.
Per-round search-archive evidence #384 merged November 13 09:20:11 Asia/Shanghai by jiangkuaixue123, merge commit a4410d69c46a57cb21f158b9c3e757b131f4460a, head c2730670b06c7c1934671fa78452249993e8e605 (21 files, +4928/−1). Refs #344, still open with status:proposed. Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459 and david6666666. This lands an archivable per-round search JSON under observability. The PR states that Dashboard display and statistical acceptance remain with #344, that recall needs an independent corpus check, and that performance benefit needs an experimental contrast. Software delivery is not issue acceptance.
H02 single-CPU execute on main #421 merged November 13 15:16:34 Asia/Shanghai by Dong1017, merge commit bf9aeeb528b5354e53b8f9e9476d3c5f853e7a74, head 98b63b11eca0f7911d4d99ba1f98c387ae55dfb7 (24 files, +2187/−219). Refs #411, which remains open. Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459 and cursor[bot]. This moves allocate / execute / read and the process-domain supervisor into inferrsi.harness, and deletes infra/executors/. It does not deliver metric edges, residual cleanup, the skill-eval split, runner decoupling, or overall isolation. The PR records overall isolation_complete as false and does not claim goal acceptance.
Apps output and replay slice; design accepted On #371, now open with status:accepted, the proposer recorded a first-phase design decision at November 13 09:31:40 Asia/Shanghai, and Dong1017 recorded a confirming decision at 09:43:34. Those records accept the current Apps path, output contract, CLI and Harness field boundaries, the execution_spec.request_digest public entry with a run_store.request_digest compatibility export, and the recorded OBS (#413) / B01 (#414) split. Four implementation-acceptance boxes in the #371 body remain unchecked. Design acceptance is not S5 implementation acceptance. #397 then merged November 13 17:05:44 Asia/Shanghai by zengchuang-hw, merge commit 8150ee048af6503070fa71768fbf64dffcc1a77e, head d497762152c7a05f593e9d836fb6b54519a567f0 (13 files, +1607/−7). Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459 and cursor[bot]. The PR delivers canonical Apps manifest.json / result.json publication, retained references on publication errors, and replay against the saved Harness request. It states that production execution, Benchmark integration, and the new evaluate CLI remain follow-up work. #371 remains open.
#387 still Proposed; B01 PR opened, not merged #387 is unchanged since November 11 10:24:55 Asia/Shanghai: open, status:proposed, four boxes unchecked. #422 is an open ready B01 PR and is not on the pinned main. Other still-unmerged ready PRs include #405, #400, #382, #342 and #328. Opening or reviewing them is not main delivery.
Downstream #353 campaign still short of target #353 remains open. The contributor posted a series of receipts after the previous status update. The latest recorded comment, November 13 08:14:45 Asia/Shanghai, says the current candidate has no official TPOT conclusion yet. Earlier same-interval receipts still described the C1/C4/C16 ≤25 ms/token target as unmet. Those numbers are attributed contributor receipts on a downstream tree, not measurements of InferRSI main, and they were not independently replayed here.

3. Architecture delta

flowchart TB
  P0b["Implemented: P0b first-wave gate"] --> R["Mixed tree still present; overall isolation_complete is false"]
  K01["Implemented: K01 seven Knowledge bodies under inferrsi.knowledge"] --> R
  H01["Implemented: H01 local SQLite RunStore"] --> H02["Implemented: H02 allocate / execute / read and process domain"]
  H02 --> R
  Apps["Implemented: Apps output and replay slice under inferrsi.apps"] --> R
  Opt["Implemented: shared optimization-management entry #338"] --> R
  Obs["Implemented: search archive #384 and profile timing review #401"] --> R
  D["#371 Apps design accepted; #387 public interfaces still Proposed"] -. "design record is not S5 acceptance" .-> Apps
  Open["#407 and #411 remain open after the K01 and H02 merges; B01 PR #422 is unmerged"] -. "an open Issue or PR is not main delivery" .-> K01
Loading

On the pinned main, src/inferrsi/knowledge/, src/inferrsi/apps/ and src/inferrsi/benchmark/ now exist, but the pre-migration mixed tree is still present. Root Knowledge shells remain until R01. K01 and H02 both record overall isolation_complete as false. #397 adds the Apps publication/replay slice; it does not close #371 or deliver production execution. #422 is not on this main.

4. Capability status

| Workstream | Code delivered | Goal acceptance / measured effect |
|---|---|
| P0b / #387 / K01 | #395 gate contract and #418 Knowledge-body move are on the pinned main | #387 remains open with status:proposed and four unchecked boxes. #407 remains open. overall isolation_complete is still false. |
| H01 / H02 | #398 RunStore and #421 single-CPU execute/process domain are on the pinned main | This is software delivery of the local execute path, not residual cleanup, not runner decoupling, and not a campaign result. #411 remains open. |
| #371 Apps design / #397 | Design accepted in the recorded #371 comments; #397 output/replay slice is on the pinned main | Four #371 boxes remain unchecked. Production execution, Benchmark integration and the new evaluate CLI are still follow-up. #371 remains open. Design acceptance is not implementation acceptance. |
| Optimization management #338 / #336 | Shared management entry is on the pinned main | Author-recorded knowledge on/off finals are 1.4806× vs 1.9159× on a pre-merge commit; later review fixes were not re-run on NPU. #336 remains open. Those receipts were not independently replayed here. |
| Profile review #389 / #401 / #333 / #345 | Review and timing/search UI are on the pinned main | #333 and #345 remain Proposed. #401 states there are no new GPU measurements. The earlier #389 receipts remain short of the 50% target and unadopted. |
| Search archive #384 / #344 | Archivable per-round search JSON is on the pinned main | #344 remains Proposed. The PR does not treat recall or performance benefit as established. |
| MindIE #374 / #393 | Bounded read-only slice remains on the pinned main | #374 remains open and Proposed. The earlier merge is still not whole-issue acceptance. |
| Downstream acceptance #353 | No InferRSI-main delivery in this interval | Contributor receipts continue; the latest recorded comment has no official TPOT for the current candidate, and the ≤25 ms/token target remains unmet in the earlier same-interval receipts. |

5. Evidence and limitations

This check read the latest Status search, the Status 04 body and its in-week updates, the #61 index, current main ancestry, selected changed paths, scoped acceptances, reviews, and hosted check metadata. The mermaid diagram above reflects implemented paths and recorded design state on the pinned main; it is not a module import graph.

On the pinned main, merge-lane and knowledge declaration policy succeeded on the push at November 13 17:05:48 Asia/Shanghai. That is not a full-suite or all-CI-green claim for this SHA. Full-suite software evidence cited above belongs to the reviewed pull-request heads. Green software checks do not establish measured effect, knowledge efficacy or campaign acceptance.

#338 and #353 numbers are attributed author or contributor receipts at their original revisions and protocols. This report does not independently replay device artifacts or publish internal host or account paths.

No tests, installations, model or provider calls, workflows or experiments were started for this report. No code, labels, settings or other workstream state was changed by this reporting run, except the authorized Status edition, #61 index and Status 04 rollover once those writes are verified.

6. Next decisions

  1. Under task: K01 — 七个 Knowledge 主体迁移与清单同审 #407 / task: H02 — 单 CPU execute 与进程控制域一次迁入 Harness #411, keep the merged K01 and H02 slices separate from Issue closure and from overall isolation completion. Residual cleanup, K02 packaged resources, R01 root-shell retirement, OBS and B01 still need their own review.
  2. Under task: Apps 应用层详细设计与迁移计划（CLI / Python / Plugin） #371 / rfc: K/H/B 与 Apps 公开接口详细设计（最小交接与模块边界） #387 / Publish standardized Apps run output #397, keep the recorded Apps design acceptance and the merged output/replay slice separate from S5 implementation acceptance. The four task: Apps 应用层详细设计与迁移计划（CLI / Python / Plugin） #371 boxes and the four rfc: K/H/B 与 Apps 公开接口详细设计（最小交接与模块边界） #387 boxes remain open until maintainers record written acceptance or revision.
  3. Under feat: share RSI optimization management across project and benchmark tasks #338 / tracking: grow reusable engineering optimization tasks #336 and feat: record per-round knowledge searches and adoption evidence #384 / task: 支持每个优化迭代的知识库命中归因统计 #344, treat the merged management and archive software as deliveries with author-recorded receipts, not as library-wide or attribution-goal acceptance.
  4. Under Review measured request profiles and decisions across optimization rounds #389 / Compare stage timings and inspect knowledge searches for each profile #401 / discussion: what trace evidence should InferRSI persist beyond per-run artifacts? #333 / task: Dashboard 增强：每轮改动说明、动态 workflow 与耗时、测试进度 #345 and task: 支持 MindIE Agent 对接（知识、执行与评测交接） #374, keep the merged review and MindIE slices distinct from those Issues' remaining acceptance criteria. Keep acceptance: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 910C 8K/1K TPOT ≤25 ms/token at C1/C4/C16 #353's unmet target visible as a contributor campaign, not as an InferRSI-main result.

Activity

  1. Dong1017
    added
    kind:statusPeriodic status snapshot
    area:processRepo-wide process, governance, privacy and security rules
    on Nov 13, 2026

  2. amy-why-3459 commented on Nov 13, 2026

    @amy-why-3459
    amy-why-3459
    on Nov 13, 2026 – with Cursor
    Collaborator

    Thanks for Status 05. The 1246348f → 8150ee04 advance (30 commits, seven since the last delta) is easy to trace, and each of the seven new rows pairs the merge commit, head, and exact-head approvals with a clear acceptance boundary. That makes the snapshot straightforward to audit.

    Some notes on the snapshot and the §6 next decisions:

    1. Delivery is kept separate from acceptance. K01 (knowledge: move seven bodies into inferrsi.knowledge and revise the manifest (K01) #418) and H02 (harness: move single-CPU execute and the process domain into H (H02) #421) both record overall isolation_complete = false, and task: K01 — 七个 Knowledge 主体迁移与清单同审 #407 / task: H02 — 单 CPU execute 与进程控制域一次迁入 Harness #411 stay open. That is the right framing. The residual items (K02 packaged resources, R01 root-shell retirement, OBS task: OBS — 解散 observability 过渡包并归位记录与展示 #413, B01 task: B01 — 旧 run/evaluate 整链迁入最终归属 #414) still need their own scoped review. They should not be read as implied by the first-wave merges.

    2. Apps design vs. S5 implementation. The task: Apps 应用层详细设计与迁移计划（CLI / Python / Plugin） #371 entry keeps three things distinct: the recorded design decisions (6841117777 / 6841315306), the merged Publish standardized Apps run output #397 output/replay slice, and the four unchecked implementation boxes. Production execution, Benchmark integration, and the evaluate CLI are still listed as follow-up. That matches what I saw while reviewing Publish standardized Apps run output #397. One possible improvement: say explicitly in §6 item 2 who owns writing the S5 acceptance record. That would help task: Apps 应用层详细设计与迁移计划（CLI / Python / Plugin） #371 converge.

    3. The feat: share RSI optimization management across project and benchmark tasks #338 knowledge on/off receipts need careful reading. On the pre-merge commit, the author-recorded finals are 1.4806× with knowledge on and 1.9159× with knowledge off. The knowledge-on arm used fewer tokens and less wall time. That is a single search, and later review fixes were not re-run on NPU. Presenting it as a receipt and not as a knowledge-efficacy result is correct. If tracking: grow reusable engineering optimization tasks #336 is meant to settle the measured-effect question, a repeated or seeded contrast on the merged head would be the natural next step.

    4. Unmet targets stay visible. It is good that acceptance: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 910C 8K/1K TPOT ≤25 ms/token at C1/C4/C16 #353's C1/C4/C16 ≤25 ms/token target is still marked unmet, and that its latest candidate is listed as having no official TPOT. The same applies to the Review measured request profiles and decisions across optimization rounds #389 receipts staying below the 50% target. Please keep both on the board until the owners record a result.

    5. The CI scope is stated precisely. §5 limits the claim to merge-lane and knowledge-declaration checks on 8150ee04, and says it is not a full-suite or all-green claim. That avoids over-claiming for a main that only ran a subset.

    Happy to help review the open ready PRs listed in §2 (e.g. #422 for B01) as they move forward.

  3. Dong1017 commented on Nov 13, 2026

    @Dong1017
    Dong1017
    on Nov 13, 2026 – with Cursor
    CollaboratorAuthor

    In-week developer update — 2026-11-13 evening

    1. Snapshot

    • Change coverage interval: previous Status 05 weekly edition, 2026-11-13 17:25:31 → 2026-11-13 19:18 Asia/Shanghai. Actual observation for this check: 19:14–19:18 Asia/Shanghai. The nominal Friday 19:00 obligation fired at 19:14:44. The weekly edition's observation ended at 17:26; this check records later changes only and does not issue a second weekly edition.
    • Edition window: [2026-11-13 17:25:31, 2026-11-20 17:25:31) Asia/Shanghai. This is one in-week update on Status 05, not a new Status number.
    • Published baseline: 8150ee048af6503070fa71768fbf64dffcc1a77e.
    • Pinned main: d61552eb293b7f1f84e47660bdab4da840aef86c, two commits after the weekly pin. Comparison

    Two previously unmerged ready PRs landed on main after the weekly edition: the acceptance-criteria workflow/template slice, then the Dashboard experiment-curve view. First-wave isolation is still incomplete. The governing Issues for those slices remain open. Newly opened Apps-prepare and OBS PRs are not on this main.

    2. What changed

    Change Delivery and acceptance boundary
    Acceptance-criteria workflow on main #400 merged November 13 17:56:07 Asia/Shanghai by amy-why-3459, merge commit fe16b29388de29708d30ea388b589355540f3172, head 828418af0e151a98c15ad5b1aebb7c11b7726f6c (24 files, +259/−40). Refs #399, which remains open. Exact-head approvals: zengchuang-hw and david6666666. This is the agent workflow and campaign-template slice: keep user-supplied criteria, and derive only missing targets with ceiling analysis when criteria are absent. The PR states that CLI, RunSpec and evaluator behavior are unchanged, that existing campaign evidence is untouched, and that no accelerator campaign or model-efficacy claim is in scope. Skill-eval execution was planned and not run. Merging this PR does not close #399 and is not broader #143 completion.
    Dashboard experiment curves on main #405 merged November 13 19:16:10 Asia/Shanghai by amy-why-3459, merge commit d61552eb293b7f1f84e47660bdab4da840aef86c, head 97b5dad06d0bb792455e5da44d9c668b3f004c97 (22 files, +3360/−32). Refs #392, which remains open with status:proposed and unchecked completion boxes. Exact-head approvals: zengchuang-hw and cursor[bot]. The PR adds absolute performance curves, an event track and evidence drill-down, and states that the published figures are desensitized synthetic fixtures, not hardware measurements or campaign PASS. The PR also leaves RFC acceptance, ownership and closure of #392 with maintainers. Software delivery is not RFC acceptance.
    Apps prepare and OBS PRs opened, not merged #424 opened 17:33:30 Asia/Shanghai, head e48ab8d31acf48706f0dc6ffb8becf4ce17e3b67, with an exact-head approval from amy-why-3459. It implements the Apps prepare-archive step from the accepted #371 design, on top of merged #397, and leaves production Benchmark prepare/encode and the Harness evaluation-mode port as follow-up. #425 opened 17:58:15 Asia/Shanghai, head cf08a8784d105f78048d1d962b428d86df555047, with an exact-head approval from amy-why-3459 that covers code and owner-row placement only. That approval is not D008 acceptance; the new rows remain marked pending formal review. #422 remains open at head f6371b5c6adae56173bb2a1ab4d09a9457ad2d62. A recorded review of that head says the #397 stack and Harness-signature items were resolved, and that formal D008 acceptance for the two pending owner rows is still required before approval. Opening or reviewing these PRs is not main delivery.
    #371 design acceptance unchanged; #406 still Proposed #371 remains open with status:accepted. The four implementation-acceptance boxes in the body are still unchecked. Later comments request remaining production ports and formal D008 acceptance on #422 / #425; those are requests, not recorded acceptance. #406 remains open with status:proposed. A recorded independent design review found no further blocking text changes and did not accept the issue or name an owner. Merging #405 does not accept #406. #387 was not updated in this interval and remains as recorded in Status 05: open, status:proposed, four boxes unchecked.

    3. Architecture delta

    flowchart TB
  Prior["Already on the weekly pin: K01, H02, Apps output/replay, #338, #384, #401"] --> R["Mixed tree still present; overall isolation_complete is false"]
  Crit["Implemented after the weekly pin: acceptance-criteria workflow #400"] --> R
  Dash["Implemented after the weekly pin: Dashboard experiment curves #405"] --> R
  D["#371 Apps design accepted; #392 and #387 still Proposed"] -. "a design or RFC record is not issue acceptance" .-> Dash
  Open["Unmerged: B01 #422, Apps prepare #424, OBS #425"] -. "an open PR is not main delivery" .-> R
    Loading

    The weekly-pin deliveries remain on this ancestry. #400 adds the criteria-preparation procedure and catalog projections; it does not change runtime evaluator gates. #405 adds the Dashboard curve/event view under the existing observability tree; the observability/ package is still present on this main because #425 is unmerged. #407 and #411 remain open, and overall isolation_complete is still false.

    4. Capability status

    | Workstream | Code delivered | Goal acceptance / measured effect |
    |---|---|
    | Acceptance criteria #399 / #400 | #400 workflow and template slice is on the pinned main | #399 remains open. This is not issue closure, not #143 completion, and not a model-efficacy result. |
    | Dashboard curves #392 / #405 | #405 curve, event-track and drill-down view is on the pinned main | #392 remains open and Proposed. The PR's figures are synthetic fixtures, not hardware measurements or campaign PASS. |
    | Apps / B01 / OBS | #397 remains on the ancestry; #424, #422 and #425 are unmerged | #371 design acceptance is unchanged; the four implementation boxes remain unchecked. Recorded reviews still require formal D008 acceptance before merging #422 and #425. |
    | First-wave isolation | Unchanged from Status 05: K01 and H02 are on the ancestry | #407 and #411 remain open. overall isolation_complete is still false. |
    | #406 knowledge-display follow-up | No #406 implementation PR in this interval | #406 remains Proposed. A design review is not acceptance. |

    5. Evidence and limitations

    This check read the latest Status search (open and closed), the Status 05 body and its only comment, the #61 index, current main ancestry, the two new merge commits, scoped reviews and comments, and hosted check metadata. There was no earlier in-week increment covering these changes. The mermaid diagram reflects implemented paths and recorded design state on the pinned main; it is not a module import graph.

    On the #400 push to fe16b29388de29708d30ea388b589355540f3172, merge-lane and knowledge declaration policy succeeded at November 13 17:56:10 Asia/Shanghai. On the pinned main, merge-lane succeeded on the #405 push at 19:16:13, completing at 19:16:33. Knowledge declaration policy on that same SHA was still in progress at the end of this check. That is not a full-suite or all-CI-green claim for this SHA. Full-suite software evidence cited in the pull requests belongs to the reviewed heads. Green software checks do not establish measured effect, knowledge efficacy or campaign acceptance.

    Author-recorded and reviewer-recorded test counts at those heads were not independently replayed here. This report does not publish internal host or account paths.

    This in-week update is posted on Status 05 because it falls inside the current seven-day edition window. New index comments go to #61.

    No tests, installations, model or provider calls, workflows or experiments were started for this report. No code, labels, settings or other workstream state was changed.

    6. Next decisions

    1. Under task: prefer user acceptance criteria and derive missing targets with ceiling analysis #399 / [RFC] Hardware-aware optimization goals throughout the RSI workflow #143, keep the merged workflow/template slice separate from Issue closure and from any efficacy claim.
    2. Under rfc: 将 Dashboard 成功与失败记录改为性能曲线与事件标记 #392 / task: Dashboard 补齐知识检索路径、排序解释与候选证据关联 #406, keep the merged Dashboard curve view separate from RFC acceptance and from the still-proposed knowledge-display follow-up. First-scope ownership of task: Dashboard 补齐知识检索路径、排序解释与候选证据关联 #406 remains unassigned.
    3. Under task: Apps 应用层详细设计与迁移计划（CLI / Python / Plugin） #371 / task: B01 — 旧 run/evaluate 整链迁入最终归属 #414 / task: OBS — 解散 observability 过渡包并归位记录与展示 #413, keep the recorded Apps design acceptance and the unmerged Archive complete Apps preparations #424 / benchmark: split the legacy run/evaluate chain into B, H, and Apps legacy (B01) #422 / observability: dissolve the transition package into H records, Apps views, and K (OBS) #425 slices separate from S5 implementation acceptance. Formal D008 acceptance still has to be recorded before those pending owner rows can be treated as accepted.
    4. Under task: K01 — 七个 Knowledge 主体迁移与清单同审 #407 / task: H02 — 单 CPU execute 与进程控制域一次迁入 Harness #411, keep the merged K01 and H02 slices separate from Issue closure and from overall isolation completion.

  4. Dong1017 commented on Nov 14, 2026

    @Dong1017
    Dong1017
    on Nov 14, 2026 – with Cursor
    CollaboratorAuthor

    In-week developer update — 2026-11-14 evening

    1. Snapshot

    • Change coverage interval: previous Status 05 in-week update, 2026-11-13 19:18 → 2026-11-14 19:20 Asia/Shanghai. Actual observation for this check: 19:15–19:20 Asia/Shanghai. The nominal Saturday 19:00 obligation fired at 19:15:42. This check records later changes only and does not issue a second weekly edition.
    • Edition window: [2026-11-13 17:25:31, 2026-11-20 17:25:31) Asia/Shanghai. This is one in-week update on Status 05, not a new Status number.
    • Previous pin: d61552eb293b7f1f84e47660bdab4da840aef86c.
    • Pinned main: 57f8e8a4915b38201d9fa58d4d05acbe3c4199ee, four commits after the previous pin. Comparison

    Four pull requests landed on main after the Friday evening increment: the Apps prepare archive, the Apps frozen-spec binder, the Fable 5.2 admission-policy change, and the Dashboard knowledge-retrieval navigation slice. The governing Issues for those slices remain open. Newly opened follow-on Issues and PRs are not on this main.

    2. What changed

    Change Delivery and acceptance boundary
    Apps prepare archive on main #424 merged November 13 19:24:52 Asia/Shanghai by Dong1017, merge commit f7b640f268335368301c5a6b39413683cc5e8091, head e48ab8d31acf48706f0dc6ffb8becf4ce17e3b67 (5 files, +875/−18). Refs #371, which remains open with status:accepted. Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459 and Dong1017. This is the Apps-owned prepare-archive step from the accepted #371 design, on top of merged #397: an injected Benchmark prepare/encode/validate path, an atomic no-replace closure, and a PreparedRef only after commit. The PR leaves production Benchmark prepare/encode and the Harness evaluation-mode port as follow-up. Author-recorded Windows counts at this head were not independently replayed here. Merging this PR does not close #371 and is not S5 implementation acceptance.
    Apps frozen-spec binder on main #427 merged November 13 22:33:32 Asia/Shanghai by zengchuang-hw, merge commit a590ccb25596396a592f237105166ade4aedeaaa, head 4aa801d64cf1cc2bf6bc569524485ca9d82d0d64 (4 files, +678/−40). Refs #371, which remains open. Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459 and cursor[bot]. This adds the Apps-owned binder after #424: load a fixed preparation, bind frozen worker identity and required artifact inputs, and preserve the original attempt. The PR states that T37 and production-path T40 still need the real evaluation-mode port. Author-recorded Windows counts at this head were not independently replayed here.
    Fable 5.2 admission policy on main #439 merged November 14 12:38:02 Asia/Shanghai by Dong1017, merge commit ecce581c60dbfd39bdd3ed07ef8c800b49c38231, head 1f5fa0d9c01951e0efcbe13a7eb6b6dd19c49a85 (3 files, +18/−3). Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459 and zengchuang-hw. The PR admits the exact identity claude-fable-5-2 at xhigh and max only, with no aliases, and states that the evaluator, exception process, protected paths, existing models and trusted-main policy selection are unchanged. This is an admission-policy change. It does not qualify knowledge content or run a model.
    Knowledge retrieval navigation on main #428 merged November 14 14:07:08 Asia/Shanghai by amy-why-3459, merge commit 57f8e8a4915b38201d9fa58d4d05acbe3c4199ee, head 9b6c17857227ea77554ff0c671508f2e68870830 (37 files, +1658/−49). Refs #406, which remains open with status:proposed and unchecked acceptance boxes. Exact-head approvals: zengchuang-hw and cursor[bot]. The approval by zengchuang-hw states that it applies only to this head and is not #406 acceptance or campaign performance PASS. The PR adds retrieval-path explanation and candidate/run navigation in both Dashboard layouts. Published figures and author-recorded browser checks use desensitized synthetic fixtures, not hardware measurements or campaign PASS. The Issue itself was not updated by the merge. Software delivery is not issue acceptance.
    #371 implementation acceptance unchanged; follow-on work opened, not merged #371 remains open with status:accepted. The four implementation-acceptance boxes in the body are still unchecked. Later comments request production-port owners on #429 and #430, and request confirmation of the T38 hand-off plus formal D008 acceptance on #422 / #425; those are requests, not recorded acceptance. Still unmerged at this check: B01 #422, OBS #425, K02 #426, S01 #437, and Apps follow-on #432 / #433 / #436. Opening or reviewing these PRs is not main delivery.

    3. Architecture delta

    flowchart TB
  Prior["Already on the previous pin: K01, H02, Apps output/replay, #338, #384, #401, #400, #405"] --> R["Mixed tree still present; #407 and #411 remain open"]
  Prep["Implemented after the previous pin: Apps prepare archive #424"] --> R
  Bind["Implemented after the previous pin: Apps frozen-spec binder #427"] --> R
  Policy["Implemented after the previous pin: Fable 5.2 admission #439"] --> R
  Nav["Implemented after the previous pin: knowledge retrieval navigation #428"] --> R
  D["#371 Apps design accepted; #406 still Proposed"] -. "a design record or merged slice is not issue acceptance" .-> Prep
  D -. "a merged view is not #406 acceptance" .-> Nav
  Open["Unmerged: B01 #422, OBS #425, K02 #426, S01 #437, Apps follow-on #432/#433/#436"] -. "an open PR is not main delivery" .-> R
    Loading

    The previous-pin deliveries remain on this ancestry. #424 and #427 add the Apps prepare archive and frozen-spec binder under the accepted #371 design; they do not complete production Benchmark prepare/encode or Harness evaluation-mode execute. #439 changes only the model-admission allowlist. #428 adds the Dashboard retrieval/navigation view; #406 remains Proposed, and the observability/ package is still present on this main because #425 is unmerged. #407 and #411 remain open. None of the newly merged slices claims overall isolation completion.

    4. Capability status

    | Workstream | Code delivered | Goal acceptance / measured effect |
    |---|---|
    | Apps prepare/bind #371 / #424 / #427 | #424 and #427 are on the pinned main | #371 remains open. Design acceptance is unchanged; the four implementation boxes remain unchecked. Production T37/T40 remain follow-up. |
    | Fable 5.2 admission #439 | The claude-fable-5-2 allowlist entry at xhigh/max is on the pinned main | This is an admission-policy change only. It does not qualify knowledge content or run a model. |
    | Knowledge retrieval navigation #406 / #428 | #428 view and navigation slice is on the pinned main | #406 remains open and Proposed, with unchecked acceptance boxes. The PR's figures are synthetic fixtures, not hardware measurements or campaign PASS. |
    | First-wave isolation | Unchanged from the previous increment: K01 and H02 remain on the ancestry | #407 and #411 remain open. None of the newly merged slices claims overall isolation completion. |
    | Unmerged follow-on slices | #422, #425, #426, #437 and #432 / #433 / #436 remain unmerged | Recorded #371 comments request production-port owners and still-pending D008 acceptance; those requests are not recorded acceptance. |

    5. Evidence and limitations

    This check read the latest Status search (open and closed), the Status 05 body and both existing comments, the #61 index, current main ancestry, the four new merge commits, scoped reviews and comments, related Issue state, and hosted check metadata. There was no earlier in-week increment covering these four commits. The mermaid diagram reflects implemented paths and recorded design state on the pinned main; it is not a module import graph.

    On the #424 push to f7b640f268335368301c5a6b39413683cc5e8091, merge-lane succeeded at November 13 19:25:22 Asia/Shanghai, and knowledge declaration policy succeeded at 19:25:11. On the #427 push to a590ccb25596396a592f237105166ade4aedeaaa, merge-lane succeeded at 22:33:57, and knowledge declaration policy succeeded at 22:33:55. On the #439 push to ecce581c60dbfd39bdd3ed07ef8c800b49c38231, merge-lane succeeded at November 14 12:38:23, and knowledge declaration policy succeeded at 12:40:12. On the pinned main, merge-lane succeeded on the #428 push at 14:07:42, and knowledge declaration policy succeeded at 14:07:32. That is not a full-suite or all-CI-green claim for these SHAs. Full-suite or browser-lane software evidence cited in the pull requests and reviews belongs to the reviewed heads. Green software checks do not establish measured effect, knowledge efficacy or campaign acceptance.

    Author-recorded and reviewer-recorded test counts at those heads were not independently replayed here. This report does not publish internal host or account paths.

    This in-week update is posted on Status 05 because it falls inside the current seven-day edition window. New index comments go to #61.

    No tests, installations, model or provider calls, workflows or experiments were started for this report. No code, labels, settings or other workstream state was changed.

    6. Next decisions

    1. Under task: Apps 应用层详细设计与迁移计划（CLI / Python / Plugin） #371 / task: Harness evaluation-mode CPU execute for Apps #429 / task: Benchmark production prepare and frozen resource closure #430, keep the merged prepare and binder slices separate from S5 implementation acceptance and from production T37/T40.
    2. Under task: Dashboard 补齐知识检索路径、排序解释与候选证据关联 #406 / task: 支持每个优化迭代的知识库命中归因统计 #344, keep the merged retrieval-navigation view separate from Issue acceptance and from any knowledge-efficacy or campaign PASS claim.
    3. Under policy: admit Claude Fable 5.2 at xhigh and max #439, keep the Fable 5.2 admission-policy change separate from knowledge qualification.
    4. Under task: K01 — 七个 Knowledge 主体迁移与清单同审 #407 / task: H02 — 单 CPU execute 与进程控制域一次迁入 Harness #411, keep the merged K01 and H02 slices separate from Issue closure and from overall isolation completion.
    5. Keep the unmerged B01, OBS, K02, S01 and Apps follow-on PRs separate from main delivery. Formal D008 acceptance still has to be recorded before those pending owner rows can be treated as accepted.

  5. Dong1017 commented on Nov 15, 2026

    @Dong1017
    Dong1017
    on Nov 15, 2026 – with Cursor
    CollaboratorAuthor

    In-week developer update — 2026-11-15 evening

    1. Snapshot

    • Change coverage interval: previous Status 05 in-week update, 2026-11-14 19:20 → 2026-11-15 19:21 Asia/Shanghai. Actual observation for this check: 19:14–19:21 Asia/Shanghai. The nominal Sunday 19:00 obligation fired at 19:14:42. This check records later changes only and does not issue a second weekly edition.
    • Edition window: [2026-11-13 17:25:31, 2026-11-20 17:25:31) Asia/Shanghai. This is one in-week update on Status 05, not a new Status number.
    • Previous pin: 57f8e8a4915b38201d9fa58d4d05acbe3c4199ee.
    • Pinned main: d32eb9686dc81ac02bd31e593f6acf1b2bbc75ab, thirteen commits after the previous pin. Comparison

    Thirteen pull requests landed on main after the Saturday increment: K02, S01, B01, OBS, six further Apps slices under the accepted #371 design, the formal v0.2.0 preparation, and a README news update. Formal v0.2.0 and later prerelease v0.2.1 were published in this interval. Dong1017 recorded project-owner delivery acceptance and closed #407, #409, #410, #411, #413 and #414; those records keep isolation_complete false and leave R01 open. #371, #406 and #443 remain open. Newly opened follow-on Issues and PRs are not on this main.

    2. What changed

    Change Delivery and acceptance boundary
    K02 packaged resources on main #426 merged November 14 20:45:25 Asia/Shanghai by Dong1017, merge commit acc881fe70bf0eadf7f0a3f12bf554e899142e1a, head f58f2d50b4cd590fb9cf424ba939014c13292582 (1032 files, +2246/−1712). Refs #409. Exact-head approvals: zengchuang-hw and amy-why-3459. The slice moves the knowledge corpus into knowledge/data and pack files into harness/data, and re-locks pack hashes. The PR states that overall isolation_complete stays false and that root-shell retirement is not in scope. #409 was later closed as bounded delivery acceptance; that record is not overall isolation completion.
    Apps storage mounts, evidence projection and knowledge reads #432 merged 21:41:06 by zengchuang-hw, merge 0332409337c2d59f8de2dabf0eaaaf181aceda73, head afe05e1c5532f6c0d7e901eca9e22068239e30a9 (4 files, +195/−12). Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459, cursor[bot] and Dong1017. #433 merged 21:41:27, merge 1b88811870d583469437c8a28ae3f8a35d54da10, head 71629dc73dcd4704178a69c7a6baeb1718c9a501 (2 files, +165/−5). Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459, cursor[bot] and Dong1017. #436 merged 21:53:15, merge 223ee523115d8d59eebf4568fd6ac34f4708b1d4, head 36783e6f3d097d0d755b86ba149291691b195696 (4 files, +94/−12). Exact-head approvals: cursor[bot], Dong1017 and amy-why-3459. All three Ref #371, which remains open. They add the read-only artifact port, the fixed-record EvidenceInput projection, and the standalone Apps Knowledge reader. Production Benchmark prepare/assess and Harness evaluation-mode execute remain follow-up. Author-recorded Windows counts at these heads were not independently replayed here.
    Formal v0.2.0 prepared, published, and noted in README #442 merged 21:46:11 by hsliuustc0106, merge 86435c12e060f08d70f65a45fc453cfdfc04041b, head 19b38de8fa13a3a0d6e7375306cf396cd511f7eb (6 files, +175/−11). Refs #443, which remains open. The exact-head approval recorded here is amy-why-3459; that approval covers the preparation PR only and does not authorize dispatch. Formal v0.2.0 was then published 22:03:33, draft=false and prerelease=false, with the tag pointing at 223ee523115d8d59eebf4568fd6ac34f4708b1d4 (the later #436 merge) and the five listed artifacts present. #445 merged 22:12:53, merge 37220b12d492fa15da4856a0f780a609682c887a, head 9c3729d614ff839c51ec2f3360f56f56c35d233b (1 file, +18/−1). No pull-request reviews are recorded on #445. The README change is documentation only. A later v0.2.1 prerelease was published November 15 05:56:27, tag 8c321005d50c2ecef61bf20132409d88474a6450 (#437). Release builds and notes are not campaign PASS, model quality or hardware performance. Current main is past both tags.
    S01 skill-eval split on main #437 merged November 15 04:51:50 Asia/Shanghai by Dong1017, merge commit 8c321005d50c2ecef61bf20132409d88474a6450, head 587be91f641889d5b8a7715354c963f99c432753 (66 files, +3013/−816). Refs #410. Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459 and cursor[bot]. zengchuang-hw commented on this head and did not approve it. The slice splits the four-file family by function owner and removes the residual exemption. The PR states that overall isolation_complete stays false. #410 was later closed after a recorded main-only replay on 36440109; that record closes the bounded migration/replay delivery, not skill efficacy or production qualification, and keeps isolation_complete false.
    B01 legacy run/evaluate split on main #422 merged 10:55:51 by Dong1017, merge commit 9ede1835d16352b60c559302882bf2cea3e19c0d, head e427c42c535ddb49fce0d6943b44044e03f11cf2 (51 files, +1301/−110). Refs #414. Exact-head approvals: cursor[bot] and amy-why-3459. The slice assigns scoring rules to Benchmark, execution facts to Harness, and the old run composition to apps/legacy/. The PR states that overall isolation_complete stays false. The shared D008 ownership record was adopted on #414 and #413; architecture adoption is not issue closure by itself. #414 was later closed as bounded delivery acceptance, still with isolation_complete false.
    Apps offline assessment assembly on main #444 merged 11:54:25 by zengchuang-hw, merge commit c2f463f066921a15120a3c86506c4f97b1909acb, head df74848780c80dfdc26a79c3eb6dfd814536d102 (7 files, +650/−13). Refs #371. Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459, cursor[bot] and Dong1017. The PR wires Apps offline assessment to a fixed record with injected Benchmark ports. Production Benchmark assess and the first frozen CPU task remain in #434, which is still open. Author-recorded Windows counts at this head were not independently replayed here.
    OBS dissolve on main #425 merged 12:12:54 by Dong1017, merge commit 36440109d4a81ec33fdd2e5ac28449a7fd0ddea9, head 9489466a8aae1bc3a31f8cf138bf42c601f7f124 (78 files, +1445/−727). Refs #413. Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459 and cursor[bot]. zengchuang-hw commented on this head and did not approve it. The slice dissolves observability/ into Harness records, Apps views and Knowledge projection. The close record and the PR both keep isolation_complete false; the close record also states that Windows main-control evidence remains inconclusive. #413 was later closed as bounded delivery acceptance.
    Apps fixed-status, context draft and candidate-store access #449 merged 16:40:18 by Dong1017, merge 1373ef8ee2a67947cd2503ab527a3b252728611c, head 542d04fd1f440e68445e83779b50c8e983d89a44 (6 files, +238/−3). Exact-head approvals: cursor[bot] and amy-why-3459. #446 merged 17:25:17, merge ec43d0a4a8098eab2b71e50d2e649b750eec1639, head 5c5be71f27007d456e7a278e1e5f4f2a9b034668 (2 files, +247/−0). Exact-head approvals: cursor[bot] and amy-why-3459. #448 merged 17:25:33, merge d32eb9686dc81ac02bd31e593f6acf1b2bbc75ab, head 6b7f5d3c1f9d90124c4c1894c7f78ce0f177144a (3 files, +58/−3). Exact-head approvals: amy-why-3459 and cursor[bot]. All three Ref #371. They add the fixed-attempt status view, the in-process Knowledge context draft, and the explicit candidate-store entry. Report/Dashboard/trace connection, Harness T38 retention and production CPU acceptance remain follow-up. Author-recorded Windows counts at these heads were not independently replayed here.
    Wave-two governing Issues closed as bounded delivery acceptance Dong1017 closed #411 (H02 / #421), #413 and #414 at 12:42:09; #407 and #409 at 13:27:15; and #410 at 16:18:46. Those comments record project-owner delivery acceptance of the bounded slices. Each record that states a flag value keeps isolation_complete false. Root-shell retirement remains R01. The #410 close cites a main-only replay on 36440109, not on the later pinned tip. Closing these Issues is not overall isolation completion and not a measured-effect claim.
    #371 implementation acceptance unchanged; follow-on work still open #371 remains open with status:accepted. The four implementation-acceptance boxes in the body are still unchecked. Production follow-through remains in open Issues #429, #430, #434 and #447. Still unmerged at this check: Apps report/Dashboard/trace #450 and process PR #441. #406 remains open and Proposed. #443 remains open after the v0.2.0 publication. Opening or reviewing these items is not further main delivery.

    3. Architecture delta

    flowchart TB
  Prior["Already on the previous pin: K01, H02, Apps output/replay/prepare/bind, #338, #384, #401, #400, #405, #428, #439"] --> R["Mixed tree reduced; observability package dissolved on this pin"]
  K02["Implemented after the previous pin: K02 packaged resources #426"] --> R
  S01["Implemented after the previous pin: S01 skill-eval split #437"] --> R
  B01["Implemented after the previous pin: B01 legacy run split #422"] --> R
  OBS["Implemented after the previous pin: OBS dissolve #425"] --> R
  Apps["Implemented after the previous pin: Apps #432/#433/#436/#444/#449/#446/#448"] --> R
  Rel["Published after the previous pin: formal v0.2.0; later v0.2.1 prerelease"] --> R
  D["#371 Apps design accepted; four implementation boxes still unchecked"] -. "a merged slice or Issue close is not S5 acceptance" .-> Apps
  Closed["Closed as bounded delivery: #407/#409/#410/#411/#413/#414"] -. "those close records keep isolation_complete false" .-> R
  Open["Unmerged: Apps #450, process #441; open #429/#430/#434/#447, #406, #443, R01"] -. "an open PR or Issue is not main delivery" .-> R
    Loading

    The previous-pin deliveries remain on this ancestry. K02, S01, B01 and OBS are now on main, and observability/ is no longer a transition package on this pin. The later Apps slices add storage mounts, evidence projection, knowledge reads, offline assessment assembly, fixed-status views, a process-local context draft and explicit candidate-store access under the accepted #371 design. They do not complete production Benchmark prepare/assess, Harness evaluation-mode execute, T38 retention, or the report/Dashboard/trace connection. Formal v0.2.0 is a published software release, not a measured-effect result. The close records for the wave-two Issues keep isolation_complete false and leave R01 open.

    4. Capability status

    | Workstream | Code delivered | Goal acceptance / measured effect |
    |---|---|
    | K02 / #409 / #426 | #426 is on the pinned main | #409 is closed by the recorded bounded delivery acceptance. That record keeps isolation_complete false and leaves R01 open. |
    | S01 / #410 / #437 | #437 is on the pinned main | #410 is closed after the recorded main-only replay on 36440109. The close record is not skill efficacy or production qualification, and keeps isolation_complete false. |
    | B01 / #414 / #422 | #422 is on the pinned main | #414 is closed as bounded delivery acceptance. D008 architecture adoption is already on the record; isolation_complete remains false. |
    | OBS / #413 / #425 | #425 is on the pinned main; observability/ is dissolved on this pin | #413 is closed as bounded delivery acceptance. The close record states that Windows main-control evidence remains inconclusive and keeps isolation_complete false. |
    | Apps #371 slices #432 / #433 / #436 / #444 / #449 / #446 / #448 | These six PRs are on the pinned main | #371 remains open. Design acceptance is unchanged; the four implementation boxes remain unchecked. Production T37/T40, Benchmark prepare/assess, T38 and report/Dashboard/trace remain in open #429 / #430 / #434 / #447 and unmerged #450. |
    | Formal v0.2.0 / #442 / #445 / #443 | Preparation, publication and README news are on or after this ancestry; current main is past v0.2.0 and the v0.2.1 prerelease | #443 remains open. Release artifacts and notes are not campaign PASS, model quality or hardware performance. |
    | First-wave isolation K01 / H02 | Unchanged on the ancestry; #407 and #411 are now closed as bounded delivery acceptance | The close records keep isolation_complete false and leave R01 open. Issue closure is not overall isolation completion. |
    | Knowledge retrieval navigation #406 / #428 | Unchanged from the previous increment: #428 remains on the ancestry | #406 remains open and Proposed. |

    5. Evidence and limitations

    This check read the latest Status search (open and closed), the Status 05 body and all three existing comments, the #61 index, current main ancestry, the thirteen new merge commits, scoped reviews and comments, related Issue state and close records, the v0.2.0 / v0.2.1 release metadata, and hosted check metadata. There was no earlier in-week increment covering these thirteen commits. The mermaid diagram reflects implemented paths and recorded design or close state on the pinned main; it is not a module import graph.

    On every one of the thirteen merge commits, including the pinned main, merge-lane and knowledge declaration policy succeeded. On the pinned main those runs completed at November 15 17:26:02 and 17:27:08 Asia/Shanghai. That is not a full-suite or all-CI-green claim for these SHAs. Full-suite, browser-lane, sandbox or Windows evidence cited in pull requests, reviews or Issue close records belongs to the reviewed heads or to the SHA named in that record. Green software checks do not establish measured effect, knowledge efficacy or campaign acceptance.

    Author-recorded and reviewer-recorded test counts at those heads were not independently replayed here. This report does not publish internal host or account paths.

    This in-week update is posted on Status 05 because it falls inside the current seven-day edition window. New index comments go to #61.

    No tests, installations, model or provider calls, workflows or experiments were started for this report. No code, labels, settings or other workstream state was changed.

    6. Next decisions

    1. Under task: Apps 应用层详细设计与迁移计划（CLI / Python / Plugin） #371 / task: Harness evaluation-mode CPU execute for Apps #429 / task: Benchmark production prepare and frozen resource closure #430 / task: Benchmark production offline assess for Apps #434 / task: Retain and seal Apps-delivered context in Harness (T38) #447, keep the merged Apps slices separate from S5 implementation acceptance and from production T37/T40, Benchmark prepare/assess and T38 retention.
    2. Under the close records for task: K01 — 七个 Knowledge 主体迁移与清单同审 #407 / task: K02 — 知识资源与三类加载器一并迁移打包 #409 / task: S01 — skill-eval 四文件族按 D008 拆分并删除残差 #410 / task: H02 — 单 CPU execute 与进程控制域一次迁入 Harness #411 / task: OBS — 解散 observability 过渡包并归位记录与展示 #413 / task: B01 — 旧 run/evaluate 整链迁入最终归属 #414, keep bounded delivery acceptance separate from overall isolation completion and from R01 root-shell retirement.
    3. Under task: S01 — skill-eval 四文件族按 D008 拆分并删除残差 #410, keep the recorded main-only replay on 36440109 separate from skill-efficacy or production-qualification claims, and do not treat it as evidence on the later pinned tip.
    4. Under task: Dashboard 补齐知识检索路径、排序解释与候选证据关联 #406 / task: 支持每个优化迭代的知识库命中归因统计 #344, keep the earlier retrieval-navigation view separate from Issue acceptance and from any knowledge-efficacy or campaign PASS claim.
    5. Under Release decision: one-off formal InferRSI v0.2.0 #443, keep the published v0.2.0 software release separate from measured-effect claims, and keep unmerged Connect report Dashboard and trace to fixed attempt records #450 and Require two approvals independently of change requests #441 separate from main delivery.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    area:processRepo-wide process, governance, privacy and security ruleskind:statusPeriodic status snapshot

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions