{2026.06}[2026.1] SciPy-bundle 2026.05 - #1585
Open
bedroge wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2026.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/amd/zen2 |
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
Collaborator
Author
|
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2026.06-software instance:eessi-bot-riscv-prod for:arch=riscv64/generic |
|
New job on instance
|
Collaborator
Author
|
Failing tests on RISC-V: |
Collaborator
Author
|
Going to ignore RISC-V for now. bot: build repo:eessi.io-2026.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/amd/zen3 |
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
Collaborator
Author
|
There are test failures for scipy for various targets. aarch64/generic + neoverse n1: neoverse v1 test failures: |
Contributor
|
@bedroge Wouldn't be the first time we need to ignore some test failures on It is interesting that all tests are passing for Any more details on how the tests fail exactly? Is it persistent? |
Contributor
|
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2026.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=aarch64/generic |
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
|
New job on instance
|
Collaborator
Author
True, though we didn't have to do this for recent versions, and neither for generic/neoverse n1: https://github.com/EESSI/software-layer-scripts/blob/main/eb_hooks.py#L1852. Most of them are numerical errors: |
Collaborator
Author
|
The ones for neoverse v1: @boegel These are actually very similar to the ones that you reported in scipy/scipy#25346, and for which a patch was added in easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#26223. |
Collaborator
Author
|
Tried with some different OpenBLAS versions (also the one that works fine in 2025.06), but that didn't solve it. Now trying different numpy/scipy versions... |
Contributor
|
@bedroge Let's open issues upstream for this, see what they provide as feedback. I would make a separate issue for the failing And then also an issue for the bunch of failing tests we see on |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.