Skip to content

docs: name the setup command in README and record the Stage 4 decisions - #127

Merged
kcramakrishna merged 3 commits into
devfrom
docs/readme-setup-command
Nov 6, 2026
Merged

kcramakrishna merged 3 commits into
devfrom
docs/readme-setup-command

Conversation

@kcramakrishna

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What

  • README.md gets a "Setup (non-interactive)" section: ./gradlew assemble (JDK 21). AGENTS.md now points to it, so people and agents read one source (audit finding EXEC-03).
  • The second audit's 15 findings carry the owner's Stage 4 decisions: 10 rejected, 4 deferred, 1 edited. Blockers were decided one at a time.
  • The final report JSON is added (phase-1 score 0.7262, unchanged: decisions do not change check verdicts). Its rendered Markdown is not committed, because it would raise the Markdown lint count.

Checks

  • Markdown lint count unchanged on the edited files (139 before and after for README.md and AGENTS.md).
  • Report validates with validate_report.py.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

kcramakrishna and others added 3 commits November 6, 2026 17:51
Humans and agents now read one source for the setup step (./gradlew assemble).
Addresses audit finding EXEC-03 (second audit F-001).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
15 findings decided: 10 rejected, 4 deferred, 1 edited (F-001, fixed by the README
setup section). The four blockers were decided one at a time.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Made by finalise from the decided draft; phase-1 score 0.7262. The rendered
Markdown is not committed: it would raise the Markdown lint count.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Nov 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kcramakrishna
kcramakrishna added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 6, 2026
Merged via the queue into dev with commit 50a1d74 Nov 6, 2026
11 checks passed
@kcramakrishna
kcramakrishna deleted the docs/readme-setup-command branch November 6, 2026 12:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant