Skip to content

ci: always use latest v4 for codeql - #1655

Merged
ZohebShaikh merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codeql-branch
Sep 7, 2026
Merged

ci: always use latest v4 for codeql#1655
ZohebShaikh merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codeql-branch

Conversation

@ZohebShaikh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In each codeql version the bundle is getting updated, and we are receiving it later because we merge it manually to the latest.
The commit has was required for un-trusted actions and codeql is a trusted action by github

@ZohebShaikh
ZohebShaikh requested a review from a team as a code owner September 7, 2026 08:07
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.34%. Comparing base (a9eaad7) to head (6c1d5c0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1655   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.34%   96.34%           
=======================================
  Files          46       46           
  Lines        3666     3666           
=======================================
  Hits         3532     3532           
  Misses        134      134           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Alexj9837 Alexj9837 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ZohebShaikh
ZohebShaikh added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 7, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit cf9d9ce Sep 7, 2026
18 checks passed
@ZohebShaikh
ZohebShaikh deleted the codeql-branch branch September 7, 2026 09:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants