feat(chords): surface actionable rehearsal guidance - #776
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 18 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@opencode-agent address This feature is now Draft because exact head Do not absorb the Undici update into this feature branch. After #751 merges, rebase onto the security-fixed |
|
@coderabbitai review Please review exact current head @opencode-agent Please review the same exact head after current-head checks complete. This is review-only: do not update branches, merge, release, or modify protection. @cwl-noema-review Please independently review this exact head after required checks complete; do not reuse predecessor evidence. |
|
|
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head63d7c10f8e5277939e846cb3e67d5d509ed3fb19. -
Head SHA:
63d7c10f8e5277939e846cb3e67d5d509ed3fb19 -
Workflow run: 31198228227
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence. Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (5 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head0fb84177a7aed20372de0f50dfc8151045dcbe4b. -
Head SHA:
0fb84177a7aed20372de0f50dfc8151045dcbe4b -
Workflow run: 31586141897
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (5 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
Scope cleanup is now exact at head |
|
@opencode-agent Please run a fresh exact-head review and coverage pass on |
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head61438c94f4e2e5bfe998a226ddecde9619cdf372. -
Head SHA:
61438c94f4e2e5bfe998a226ddecde9619cdf372 -
Workflow run: 31848217930
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| - .github/workflows/repair-pr-776-reachable-guidance.yml | ||
|
|
||
| permissions: | ||
| contents: write |
2 participants
Buyer-visible gap
The current three-file implementation adds setup, simplification, and overlap-warning copy only to
ChordsFeature, but that component has no production import or route in the current desktop application. The buyer therefore cannot reach the claimed guidance. It also hard-codes English labels despite the active Workspace using synchronized English/Korean locale dictionaries, and the active Workspace currently conflates a missingtranspositionPlanwithsimplification.Test-first reachability repair in progress
Exact temporary head:
899087bca3fa5d3268b3f22da1b6880900e60655.Protected base:
develop@acdbea6344fe1231c39535b575f4de35e4c607c9.Temporary branch-only files:
.github/workflows/repair-pr-776-reachable-guidance.yml;.github/scripts/repair_pr_776.py.The bounded repair run
31883722100is queued. It is designed to:ChordsFeatureand its isolated test to protecteddevelop, removing dead-view-only product claims;Workspacebefore changing implementation;nonesentinels, and Korean labels;CHANGELOG.md;Queued is not success. The earlier large inline-workflow attempt failed at workflow startup before creating a job; it made no product/test commit and was replaced by the minimal launcher above.
Intended product contract
Merge gate
Keep unmerged until the temporary repair self-deletes, the resulting exact head passes every repository and central required check, #783 establishes the protected-base dependency baseline,
.github#1008clears the central trusted-uv prerequisite, zero actionable current-head threads remain, a qualifying independent non-author last-push approval exists, and branch protection permits merge without bypass. Queued, failed-startup, predecessor-head, skipped-required, protected-base, self/author, or administrative-bypass evidence is not success.Supersedes #773 only after protected merge.