docs: correct runtime attribution and record coverage evidence - #984
seonghobae wants to merge 143 commits into
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough로컬 엔드포인트 측정 규칙과 시스템 관측 결과를 추가했습니다. UI, API, mock, 커버리지, 숫자 지수 렌더링의 검증 결과와 테스트 진단 기준도 기록했습니다. Changes런타임 측정 및 검증
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Merge Risk: 🔵 Low · up to This documentation update leaves one Markdown formatting warning in the PR reference text. It has no runtime impact, but should be corrected to keep documentation lint-clean. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
seonghobae
added
documentation
ChatGPT Codex Connector
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
faad61903b1f1bf51ad734788f38c42fc731eabe. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- Required Noema Review/noema-review: FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/LineageWeave/actions/runs/34177269944/job/101909198744)
- noema-review check run: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/LineageWeave/actions/runs/34177269944/job/101909198744)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Repository file: AGENTS.md"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Repository file: AGENTS.md"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs: product-technical-gap-baseline.md"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Docs: product-technical-gap-baseline.md"]
R2 --> V2["docs review"]
OpenCode Review Overview
|
|
Exact-head |
seonghobae
changed the title
|
Current stack authority: parent #983 moved to |
This branch has not been deployed
1 participant
Current stack authority — 2026-09-23 KST
ca593487a4308daa3a0679d4fa9604bf7fc7c0c3324414e3d2f9143e2a4ec63c31bf5eb64d95c5c6#983 advanced test-only to
ca593487...with a bounded Ask transport-failure regression: network rejection must render the existing service-unreachable message, must not leak the underlying socket detail, and must not retry implicitly. Production transport behavior, coverage configuration, and thresholds are unchanged.This branch was converged immediately with an ordinary two-parent commit and a non-force ref update. Fresh compare against product parent
ca593487...has merge-base exactly at that parent andbehind_by=0. Effective child files remain onlyAGENTS.mdanddocs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md; the current parentAskAgentPanel.test.tsxblob is inherited rather than reimplemented.Descendant #992 is converged on this exact head at
e3a193c4512a057873271b101c341ffe1f80982a; its effective delta remains the gap baseline plus documentation-hygiene test.Predecessor validation receipts do not transfer. Keep Draft; this lane is not an acceptance substitute for #983's repository-wide 100% coverage repair, full suite, Security/SAST/Required CodeQL, browser/a11y evidence, independent approval, or release evidence.
No force push, destructive rebase, parent repair copy, gate weakening, merge, or release is authorized.