Skip to content

fix(review): keep each refused comment's own GitHub 422 phrase - #968

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 13 commits into
mainfrom
fix/inline-comment-per-comment-422-phrases
Closed

fix(review): keep each refused comment's own GitHub 422 phrase#968
seonghobae wants to merge 13 commits into
mainfrom
fix/inline-comment-per-comment-422-phrases

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Mixed one-at-a-time retries can 422 for different reasons. The overview still applied one shared error phrase to every refused path:line.

#963/#964/#966/#967 remain MERGEABLE with auto-merge; they are blocked by the two-approval ruleset, not a current-head code fail.

Test plan

  • pytest tests/test_opencode_inline_comment_fallback.py tests/test_opencode_agent_contract.py — 52 passed, 100% on the helper
  • pytest tests — 989 passed, 100% statements/branches, interrogate 100%
  • Current-head required checks on this PR

When GitHub refuses inline review comments, the PR-level fallback now
lists each sanitized current-head finding location instead of a generic
sentence. Suggested diffs stay out of the body.
Rebuild the fallback from gh api stderr after a refused attach so the
OpenCode overview keeps each trusted path:line next to the GitHub 422
phrase instead of a location-only list.
A single invalid path:line 422s the whole comments array. After that
failure, split the payload and retry each comment so surviving hunks
still attach; remaining failures keep the overview receipts.
The publisher moved that phrase out of the workflow YAML, so the
exact-head path-policy harness failed looking in the old file.
When some one-at-a-time inline comments attach and others 422, the
overview must list only the refused locations so attached hunks are
not reported as failed.
Mixed one-at-a-time retries can fail for different reasons. Record
path:line plus that comment's gh api error so the overview does not
reuse one shared sentence for every refused hunk.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 83 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6963190d-8f84-4270-9bfb-ca3fe31e2984

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6eb06cd and a8b3594.

📒 Files selected for processing (10)
  • .github/workflows/opencode-review-dispatch.yml
  • AGENTS.md
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • docs/doctoring/review-inline-comment-422-fallback.md
  • scripts/ci/materialize_base_python_requirements.py
  • scripts/ci/opencode_inline_comment_fallback.py
  • scripts/ci/test_strix_quick_gate.sh
  • tests/test_materialize_base_python_requirements.py
  • tests/test_opencode_agent_contract.py
  • tests/test_opencode_inline_comment_fallback.py

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@seonghobae
seonghobae enabled auto-merge (squash) August 13, 2026 07:34
@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@cwl-noema-review please review this current head. Each refused inline comment must keep its own GitHub 422 phrase next to path:line.

Keep per-comment 422 text next to path:line, but escape backticks and
HTML metacharacters before they land in the review body. Simulate the
Linux x86_64 trusted-uv installer host so the local suite stays at 100%.
@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@cwl-noema-review Please review this exact current head (000245c720f7). The head added escaped 422 phrases after the previous mention.

A bare 422 or GitHub issue #422 is not a review-write failure. Only
HTTP 422, status code 422, Error code: 422, and Unprocessable Entity
trigger the inline-comment 422 fallback.
A later one-at-a-time retry of the same path:line must keep that
comment's GitHub 422 phrase instead of dropping it as a duplicate row.
@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@cwl-noema-review Please review this exact current head (e867d6f75a2a3ebdae3629cfe1e4e3a15bf83e89). Independent Noema APPROVE on this SHA is required. Do not wait on two-approval.

A batch 422 now retries at most 20 comments. Locations past that cap
are recorded as deferred path:line rows instead of opening unbounded
gh api writes.
Materialize a base Python lock only when every package line is an exact
SHA-256 pin or a two-token relative -r/--requirement include of a
candidate lock path. A lone --require-hashes directive, ./dotted paths,
and -r other-hashes.txt no longer enter the trusted build context.
@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@cwl-noema-review exact current head df6ba012 — leftover increment kept; materialize accepts only bounded relative -r includes. Head moved. Independent Noema APPROVE on this SHA is required. Do not wait on two-approval. Reviewers remain edit: deny. NVIDIA_NIM_API_KEY only.

Leftover path:line receipts live in the overview HTML comment. Strip
HTML metacharacters and suggestion fences so a leftover cannot close
the comment or reopen an applyable GitHub suggestion block.
@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@cwl-noema-review exact current head 91c8f5c1 — leftover overview receipts now sanitize path and phrase (CWE-116). Head moved. Independent Noema APPROVE on this SHA is required. Reviewers remain edit: deny. NVIDIA_NIM_API_KEY only.

Reject leftover 422-fallback paths that contain -->, <!--, or a
suggestion fence so a leftover cannot close the overview HTML comment
or reopen an applyable GitHub suggestion block.
@seonghobae seonghobae closed this Aug 14, 2026
auto-merge was automatically disabled August 14, 2026 08:25

Pull request was closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant