Skip to content

Say in the nightly schedule comment that the Node.js nightly starts at 02:30 - #135

Merged
jwrosewell merged 1 commit into
rcfrom
ci/nightly-comment
Nov 14, 2026
Merged

jwrosewell merged 1 commit into
rcfrom
ci/nightly-comment

Conversation

@jwrosewell

@jwrosewell jwrosewell commented Nov 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The comment above the Nightly Pipeline's schedule says why this nightly starts at 05:00 UTC. Part of it went out of date when the Node.js nightly moved earlier.

Problem

.github/workflows/nightly-pipeline.yml lines 17 to 20 at cf904f8e say "The Java and Node nightlies start at 03:00". 51degrees-node#27 moved the Node.js nightly to 02:30 UTC (nightly-pipeline.yml line 10 at 6d5d4fef, cron: '30 2 * * *'), and that reaches Node.js main with its next release. The Java nightly still starts at 03:00 (nightly-pipeline.yml line 13 at f212dfc9).

What changed

The comment now says the Node.js nightly starts at 02:30 and the Java nightly at 03:00, and that both want macOS runners, so this one starts after them. The schedule itself (cron: '0 5 * * *') does not change, and no other line changes.

How it was verified

This changes a comment in a workflow file and no package code, so under the decision of 11:35 UTC on 12 November ("rebuild and include, but the change doesn't impact the code so no need to run the full builds") it has no full build of its own, and the quick checks on head 7d25073 are its build. All three passed, the environment variable name check (43613507888), Only rc into main (43613508064) and utm-link-lint (43613507828). Publish releases nothing for it, as the file is in no package's folder.

What remains

Nothing.

@jwrosewell
jwrosewell marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2026 16:42
@jwrosewell
jwrosewell merged commit 6ad5ae2 into rc Nov 14, 2026
3 checks passed
@jwrosewell
jwrosewell deleted the ci/nightly-comment branch November 14, 2026 16:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant