Adversarial review finding from PR #188.
The duplicate-search example uses DOI:10 and PMID: as alternates. If pasted literally, those prefixes match most literature-backed records and generated pages, so the search is noisy and no longer proves whether the exact candidate source is already in the repo.
Expected fix: use exact DOI and PMID placeholders in the example and warn that absence searches must not use bare DOI:10 or PMID: prefixes.
Adversarial review finding from PR #188.
The duplicate-search example uses
DOI:10andPMID:as alternates. If pasted literally, those prefixes match most literature-backed records and generated pages, so the search is noisy and no longer proves whether the exact candidate source is already in the repo.Expected fix: use exact DOI and PMID placeholders in the example and warn that absence searches must not use bare
DOI:10orPMID:prefixes.