Phase C. Blocked by #576.
An operator guide, and the honest framing carried into it.
The guide
docs/analysis-feed.md, linked from the docs index — linked, never embedded, per the existing docs convention (9f2a5ac).
Cover the five steps of PRD §6 and nothing more:
keel credentials set ANALYSIS_FEED_API_KEY- the
analysis_feed: block
keel analysis fetchkeel assets propose --from <file>- read the verdicts, attest by hand, as today
The paragraph that must not be softened
The guide states, in the operator's reading path rather than in a footnote:
This feed proposes assets. It does not decide anything. No frame influences entry, exit, sizing, stop placement, rule promotion, autonomy, or the kill-switch. The only sanctioned effect of an assessment is to appear in a shortlist you read.
And the subscription: distinction, spelled out where an operator will meet it: analysis_feed: is this. subscription: is rail 14's per-venue fee-tier attestation and stops live trading when it lapses. They are unrelated.
The risk this documents
The real risk is not a bug, it is a habit: an operator attests because the analysis was persuasive. The gate is unchanged and prose never reaches it, but attestation is a human act and a well-cited assessment is exactly the thing that erodes care over time. The guide should say so plainly — attestation still requires a named qualified source, and an assessment is not one.
Done when
Phase C. Blocked by #576.
An operator guide, and the honest framing carried into it.
The guide
docs/analysis-feed.md, linked from the docs index — linked, never embedded, per the existing docs convention (9f2a5ac).Cover the five steps of PRD §6 and nothing more:
keel credentials set ANALYSIS_FEED_API_KEYanalysis_feed:blockkeel analysis fetchkeel assets propose --from <file>The paragraph that must not be softened
The guide states, in the operator's reading path rather than in a footnote:
And the
subscription:distinction, spelled out where an operator will meet it:analysis_feed:is this.subscription:is rail 14's per-venue fee-tier attestation and stops live trading when it lapses. They are unrelated.The risk this documents
The real risk is not a bug, it is a habit: an operator attests because the analysis was persuasive. The gate is unchanged and prose never reaches it, but attestation is a human act and a well-cited assessment is exactly the thing that erodes care over time. The guide should say so plainly — attestation still requires a named qualified source, and an assessment is not one.
Done when
docs/analysis-feed.mdexists, linked not embedded, covering the five stepssubscription:distinction are in the reading path, not in a footnote